AST-02.8: Data Action Mapping
Mechanisms exist to create and maintain a map of Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted or processed.
Control Question: Does the organization create and maintain a map of Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted or processed?
General (17)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC2.1-POF5 CC2.1-POF9 |
| ISO 27002 2022 | 5.9 |
| NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 | ID.IM-P1 ID.IM-P4 ID.IM-P5 ID.IM-P8 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | CM-13 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | CM-13 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 | CM-13 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 | CM-13 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 | CM-13 |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.04.11.a 03.04.11.b |
| NIST 800-171A R3 (source) | A.03.04.11.a[01] A.03.04.11.a[02] A.03.04.11.a[03] A.03.04.11.b[01] A.03.04.11.b[02] |
| NIST 800-172 | 3.1.3e |
| NIST 800-207 | NIST Tenet 1 NIST Tenet 7 |
| SCF CORE Fundamentals | AST-02.8 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | AST-02.8 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational | AST-02.8 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | AST-02.8 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | AST-02.8 |
US (6)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) | AC.L3-3.1.3E |
| US DoD Zero Trust Execution Roadmap | 4.1.1 5.1 |
| US DHS CISA TIC 3.0 | 3.PEP.DA.DAUTE |
| US DHS ZTCF | APP-01 BAS-03 |
| US IRS 1075 | CM-13 |
| US - CA CCPA 2025 | 7123(c)(4)(A) |
EMEA (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Saudi Arabia OTCC-1 2022 | 2-4-1-16 |
APAC (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC India SEBI CSCRF | ID.AM.S2 |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.04.11.A 03.04.11.B |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to create and maintain a map of Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted or processed.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Asset Management (AST) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Asset management is informally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
- Asset inventories are performed in an ad hoc manner.
- Software licensing is tracked as part of IT asset inventories.
- Data process owners maintain limited network diagrams to document the flow of sensitive/regulated data that is specific to their initiative.
- IT personnel work with data/process owners to help ensure secure practices are implemented throughout the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for all high-value projects.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Asset Management (AST) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Asset management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for asset management.
- Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
- Asset management is formally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
- Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) are categorized according to data classification and business criticality.
- Inventories cover Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) in scope for statutory, regulatory and/ or contractual compliance, which includes both physical and virtual assets.
- Software licensing is tracked as part of IT asset inventories.
- Users are educated on their responsibilities to protect Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) assigned to them or under their supervision.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel maintain network diagrams to document the flow of sensitive/regulated data across the network.
- on at least an annual basis, or after any major technology or process change, the data/process owner updates the data mapping documentation.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Asset Management (AST) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, governs asset management to help ensure compliance with requirements for asset management.
- An ITAM function, or similar function, maintains an inventory of IT assets, covering both physical and virtual assets, as well as centrally managed asset ownership assignments.
- Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) and data are categorized according to data classification and business criticality criteria.
- A Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) function oversees supply chain risks including the removal and prevention of certain technology services and/ or equipment designated as supply chain threats by a statutory or regulatory body.
- Data/process owners document where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed, generating Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) and network diagrams to document the flow of data.
- on at least an annual basis, or after any major technology or process change, the data/process owner updates any data mapping documentation.
- A Data Protection Officer (DPO) maintains a centralized repository of personal data mapping, as well as sensitive/regulated data flows.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Asset Management (AST) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement.
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to create and maintain a map of Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted or processed.
Assessment Objectives
- AST-02.8_A01 a map of system data actions is developed and documented.
- AST-02.8_A02 the location of sensitive / regulated data is identified and documented.
- AST-02.8_A03 the system components on which sensitive / regulated data is processed are identified and documented.
- AST-02.8_A04 the system components on which sensitive / regulated data is stored are identified and documented.
- AST-02.8_A05 changes to the system or system component location where sensitive / regulated data is processed are documented.
- AST-02.8_A06 changes to the system or system component location where sensitive / regulated data is stored are documented.
- AST-02.8_A07 the location of CUI is identified and documented.
- AST-02.8_A08 the system components on which CUI is processed are identified and documented.
- AST-02.8_A09 the system components on which CUI is stored are identified and documented.
- AST-02.8_A10 changes to the system or system component location where CUI is processed are documented.
- AST-02.8_A11 changes to the system or system component location where CUI is stored are documented.
Evidence Requirements
- E-DCH-05 Data Flow Diagram (DFD)
-
Documented evidence of a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) that accurately identifies where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and/or processed.
Data Protection
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Visio
- LucidChart
Small
- Visio
- LucidChart
Medium
- Visio
- LucidChart
Large
- Visio
- LucidChart
Enterprise
- Visio
- LucidChart