Skip to main content

AST-02.8: Data Action Mapping

AST 9 — Critical Identify

Mechanisms exist to create and maintain a map of Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted or processed.

Control Question: Does the organization create and maintain a map of Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted or processed?

General (17)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC2.1-POF5 CC2.1-POF9
ISO 27002 2022 5.9
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 ID.IM-P1 ID.IM-P4 ID.IM-P5 ID.IM-P8
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) CM-13
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) CM-13
NIST 800-161 R1 CM-13
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 CM-13
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 CM-13
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.04.11.a 03.04.11.b
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.04.11.a[01] A.03.04.11.a[02] A.03.04.11.a[03] A.03.04.11.b[01] A.03.04.11.b[02]
NIST 800-172 3.1.3e
NIST 800-207 NIST Tenet 1 NIST Tenet 7
SCF CORE Fundamentals AST-02.8
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) AST-02.8
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational AST-02.8
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure AST-02.8
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats AST-02.8
US (6)
Framework Mapping Values
US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) AC.L3-3.1.3E
US DoD Zero Trust Execution Roadmap 4.1.1 5.1
US DHS CISA TIC 3.0 3.PEP.DA.DAUTE
US DHS ZTCF APP-01 BAS-03
US IRS 1075 CM-13
US - CA CCPA 2025 7123(c)(4)(A)
EMEA (1)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Saudi Arabia OTCC-1 2022 2-4-1-16
APAC (1)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC India SEBI CSCRF ID.AM.S2
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.04.11.A 03.04.11.B

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to create and maintain a map of Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted or processed.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Asset Management (AST) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Asset management is informally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
  • Asset inventories are performed in an ad hoc manner.
  • Software licensing is tracked as part of IT asset inventories.
  • Data process owners maintain limited network diagrams to document the flow of sensitive/regulated data that is specific to their initiative.
  • IT personnel work with data/process owners to help ensure secure practices are implemented throughout the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for all high-value projects.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Asset Management (AST) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Asset management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for asset management.
  • Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
  • Asset management is formally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
  • Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) are categorized according to data classification and business criticality.
  • Inventories cover Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) in scope for statutory, regulatory and/ or contractual compliance, which includes both physical and virtual assets.
  • Software licensing is tracked as part of IT asset inventories.
  • Users are educated on their responsibilities to protect Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) assigned to them or under their supervision.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel maintain network diagrams to document the flow of sensitive/regulated data across the network.
  • on at least an annual basis, or after any major technology or process change, the data/process owner updates the data mapping documentation.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Asset Management (AST) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, governs asset management to help ensure compliance with requirements for asset management.
  • An ITAM function, or similar function, maintains an inventory of IT assets, covering both physical and virtual assets, as well as centrally managed asset ownership assignments.
  • Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) and data are categorized according to data classification and business criticality criteria.
  • A Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) function oversees supply chain risks including the removal and prevention of certain technology services and/ or equipment designated as supply chain threats by a statutory or regulatory body.
  • Data/process owners document where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed, generating Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) and network diagrams to document the flow of data.
  • on at least an annual basis, or after any major technology or process change, the data/process owner updates any data mapping documentation.
  • A Data Protection Officer (DPO) maintains a centralized repository of personal data mapping, as well as sensitive/regulated data flows.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Asset Management (AST) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement.

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to create and maintain a map of Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted or processed.

Assessment Objectives

  1. AST-02.8_A01 a map of system data actions is developed and documented.
  2. AST-02.8_A02 the location of sensitive / regulated data is identified and documented.
  3. AST-02.8_A03 the system components on which sensitive / regulated data is processed are identified and documented.
  4. AST-02.8_A04 the system components on which sensitive / regulated data is stored are identified and documented.
  5. AST-02.8_A05 changes to the system or system component location where sensitive / regulated data is processed are documented.
  6. AST-02.8_A06 changes to the system or system component location where sensitive / regulated data is stored are documented.
  7. AST-02.8_A07 the location of CUI is identified and documented.
  8. AST-02.8_A08 the system components on which CUI is processed are identified and documented.
  9. AST-02.8_A09 the system components on which CUI is stored are identified and documented.
  10. AST-02.8_A10 changes to the system or system component location where CUI is processed are documented.
  11. AST-02.8_A11 changes to the system or system component location where CUI is stored are documented.

Evidence Requirements

E-DCH-05 Data Flow Diagram (DFD)

Documented evidence of a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) that accurately identifies where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and/or processed.

Data Protection

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Visio
  • LucidChart

Small

  • Visio
  • LucidChart

Medium

  • Visio
  • LucidChart

Large

  • Visio
  • LucidChart

Enterprise

  • Visio
  • LucidChart

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.