CLD-03: Cloud Infrastructure Security Subnet
Mechanisms exist to host security-specific technologies in a dedicated subnet.
Control Question: Does the organization host security-specific technologies in a dedicated subnet?
General (10)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| CSA CCM 4 | IVS-06 IVS-08 |
| CSA IoT SCF 2 | CLS-09 |
| ISO 27017 2015 | CLD.9.5.1 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | SC-7(29) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | SC-7(29) |
| NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay | SC-7(29) |
| NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay | SC-7(29) |
| NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay | SC-7(29) |
| NIST 800-171 R2 (source) | 3.13.2 NFO–PL-8 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | CLD-03 |
US (5)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (source) | SC.L2-3.13.2 |
| US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) | SC.L2-3.13.2 |
| US HIPAA HICP Large Practice | 4.L.A |
| US NSTC NSPM-33 | 6.9 |
| US - CA CCPA 2025 | 7123(c)(10) 7123(c)(5)(B) |
EMEA (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Germany C5 2020 | COS-01 COS-02 COS-05 |
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 9.2 |
APAC (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC Australia ISM June 2024 | ISM-1385 ISM-1750 |
| APAC Japan ISMAP | 12.4.5.P 13.1.4.P |
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 22.1.24.C.02 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to host security-specific technologies in a dedicated subnet.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Cloud Security (CLD) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Cloud-based technologies are governed no differently from on-premise network assets (e.g., cloud-based technology is viewed as an extension of the corporate network).
- A Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM), or similar Customer Responsibility Matrix (CRM), is documented for each Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) instance that takes into account differences between Software as a Service (SaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS) and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) methodologies.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Cloud Security (CLD) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for cloud security management. o Use an informal process to govern cloud-specific cybersecurity and data privacy-specific tools.
- Cloud security management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel:
- A Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM), or similar Customer Responsibility Matrix (CRM), is documented for each Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) instance that takes into account differences between Software as a Service (SaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS) and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) methodologies.
- IT personnel have a documented architecture for cloud-based technologies to support cybersecurity and data protection requirements.
- Cybersecurity and data privacy requirements are identified and documented for cloud-specific sensitive/regulated data processing, storing and/ or transmitting, including restrictions on data processing and storage locations.
- Network security requirements for managed subnets are identified and documented.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Cloud Security (CLD) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensure the cloud security architecture supports the organization's technology strategy to securely design, configure and maintain cloud employments. o Ensure multi-tenant CSP assets (physical and virtual) are designed and governed such that provider and customer (tenant) user access is appropriately segmented from other tenant users. o Ensure CSPs use secure protocols for the import, export and management of data in cloud-based services. o Implement a dedicated subnet to host security-specific technologies on all cloud instances, where technically feasible. o Governs changes to cloud-based systems, applications and services to ensure their stability, reliability and predictability. o Reviews processes to identify and prevent use of unapproved CSPs.
- Roles and associated responsibilities for governing cloud instances, including provisioning, maintaining and deprovisioning, are formally assigned.
- A Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM), or similar Customer Responsibility Matrix (CRM), is documented for each Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) instance that takes into account differences between Software as a Service (SaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS) and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) methodologies.
- IT architects, in conjunction with cybersecurity architects:
- A Change Advisory Board (CAB), or similar function:
- A dedicated IT infrastructure team, or similar function, enables the implementation of cloud management controls to ensure cloud instances are both secure and compliant, leveraging industry-recognized secure practices that are CC|P-specific.
- Cybersecurity and data privacy requirements are identified and documented for each CSP instance to address sensitive/regulated data processing, storing and/ or transmitting and provide restrictions on data processing and storage locations.
- A Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is used to help ensure the protection of sensitive/regulated data processed, stored or transmitted on external systems.
- Network security requirements for managed subnets are identified and documented.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Cloud Security (CLD) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to host security-specific technologies in a dedicated subnet.
Assessment Objectives
- CLD-03_A01 cloud security management subnets are logically isolated.
- CLD-03_A02 cloud security management subnet system components and functions to be isolated are defined.
- CLD-03_A03 organization-defined criteria are used to isolate cloud security management subnets.