HRS-03: Defined Roles & Responsibilities
Mechanisms exist to define cybersecurity roles & responsibilities for all personnel.
Control Question: Does the organization define cybersecurity roles & responsibilities for all personnel?
General (51)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC1.2 CC1.2-POF1 CC1.2-POF2 CC1.3 CC1.3-POF3 CC1.3-POF4 CC1.3-POF5 CC1.4-POF6 CC1.5-POF1 CC2.1-POF6 CC2.2 CC2.2-POF5 CC5.3-POF2 CC7.4-POF1 |
| APEC Privacy Framework 2015 | 9 |
| COBIT 2019 | DSS06.03 |
| COSO 2017 | Principle 2 Principle 3 Principle 14 |
| CSA CCM 4 | CEK-02 GRC-06 HRS-09 STA-04 |
| CSA IoT SCF 2 | IAM-16 |
| ENISA 2.0 | SO3 |
| IEC 62443-4-2 2019 | CR 2.1 (6.3.3(2)) |
| IMO Maritime Cyber Risk Management | 3.5.1 |
| ISO/SAE 21434 2021 | RQ-05-03 RQ-06-04 |
| ISO 22301 2019 | 8.4.2.1 8.4.2.2 8.4.2.3 8.4.2.4 |
| ISO 27001 2022 (source) | 5.3 7.3 7.3(b) |
| ISO 27002 2022 | 5.2 |
| ISO 27017 2015 | 6.1.1 7.2 |
| ISO 27701 2025 | 4.2 5.3 7.3 |
| ISO 42001 2023 | 5.3 7.2 A.3.2 |
| NIST AI 100-1 (AI RMF) 1.0 | GOVERN 2.0 GOVERN 2.1 |
| NIST AI 600-1 | GOVERN 1.5 GV-1.5-001 |
| NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 | ID.IM-P2 GV.PO-P2 GV.PO-P3 CM.PO-P2 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | PM-13 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | PM-13 PS-9 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) | PS-9 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) | PS-9 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) | PS-9 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | PM-13 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay | PS-9 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay | PS-9 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay | PS-9 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 | PM-13 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 1 | PM-13 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 | PM-13 |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.01.22.a 03.06.04.a 03.06.05.d 03.07.06.a 03.08.02 03.15.03.b 03.16.03.b |
| NIST 800-171A R3 (source) | A.03.06.05.d |
| NIST 800-172 | 3.9.1e |
| NIST 800-218 | PO.2 PO.2.1 |
| NIST CSF 2.0 (source) | GV.RM-05 GV.RR GV.RR-02 ID.AM |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) | 1.1.2 2.1.2 3.1.2 3.7.8 4.1.2 5.1.2 6.1.2 7.1.2 8.1.2 9.1.2 10.1.2 11.1.2 12.1.3 12.10.1 A3.1.3 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A (source) | 12.10.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) | 12.1.3 12.10.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B (source) | 12.1.3 12.10.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B-IP (source) | 12.1.3 12.10.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) | 12.1.3 12.10.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C-VT (source) | 12.10.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) | 1.1.2 2.1.2 3.1.2 3.7.8 4.1.2 5.1.2 6.1.2 7.1.2 8.1.2 9.1.2 10.1.2 11.1.2 12.1.3 12.10.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) | 1.1.2 2.1.2 3.1.2 3.7.8 4.1.2 5.1.2 6.1.2 7.1.2 8.1.2 9.1.2 10.1.2 11.1.2 12.1.3 12.10.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ P2PE (source) | 12.1.3 12.10.1 |
| TISAX ISA 6 | 1.2.2 1.2.4 2.1.1 9.7.2 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | HRS-03 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational | HRS-03 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | HRS-03 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | HRS-03 |
US (19)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US C2M2 2.1 | ASSET-5.E.MIL3 THREAT-3.E.MIL3 RISK-5.E.MIL3 ACCESS-4.E.MIL3 SITUATION-4.E.MIL3 RESPONSE-5.E.MIL3 THIRD-PARTIES-3.E.MIL3 WORKFORCE-3.A.MIL1 WORKFORCE-3.B.MIL1 WORKFORCE-3.C.MIL2 WORKFORCE-3.D.MIL2 WORKFORCE-3.E.MIL3 WORKFORCE-3.F.MIL3 WORKFORCE-4.E.MIL3 ARCHITECTURE-5.E.MIL3 PROGRAM-3.E.MIL3 |
| US CERT RMM 1.2 | EF:SG2.SP2 GG2.GP4 HRM:SG3.SP1 OTA:SG3.SP2 |
| US CMS MARS-E 2.0 | PM-13 |
| US DHS CISA TIC 3.0 | 3.UNI.UATRA |
| US DHS ZTCF | SEC-03 |
| US FCA CRM | 609.930(b)(3) 609.930(c)(4) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (source) | PS-9 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (low) (source) | PS-9 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) | PS-9 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) | PS-9 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (LI-SaaS) (source) | PS-9 |
| US FIPPS | 2 |
| US HIPAA Administrative Simplification 2013 (source) | 164.308(a)(3)(ii)(B) 164.310(a)(2)(i) 164.312(a)(1) 164.530(a)(2) |
| US HIPAA Security Rule / NIST SP 800-66 R2 (source) | 164.308(a)(3)(ii)(B) 164.310(a)(2)(i) 164.312(a)(1) |
| US IRS 1075 | PS-9 |
| US NERC CIP 2024 (source) | CIP-008-6 1.3 CIP-009-6 1.2 |
| US NISPOM 2020 | 8-103 8-307 |
| US SSA EIESR 8.0 | 5.7 |
| US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 | 500.10(a)(1) 500.16(a)(2)(ii) |
EMEA (15)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA EU EBA GL/2019/04 | 3.3.1(12) 3.3.2(15) |
| EMEA EU DORA | 5.2(c) |
| EMEA EU GDPR (source) | 32.4 |
| EMEA EU NIS2 Annex | 1.1.1(g) 1.2.1 1.2.4 1.2.6 10.1.1 2.1.2(i) 3.1.2(c) 3.1.3 4.2.4(c) 4.3.2(a) |
| EMEA Germany C5 2020 | PSS-08 |
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 4.13 18.10 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia IoT CGIoT-1 2024 | 1-3-1 1-3-2 1-8-1 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia OTCC-1 2022 | 1-2 1-2-1 1-2-1-1 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia PDPL | 30.2 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia SACS-002 | TPC-26 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia SAMA CSF 1.0 | 3.1.4 |
| EMEA Spain BOE-A-2022-7191 | 11.1 11.2 11.3 13.1 13.2 13.2(a) 13.2(b) 13.2(c) 13.2(d) 13.3 13.4 13.5 |
| EMEA Spain 311/2022 | 11.1 11.2 11.3 13.1 13.2 13.2(a) 13.2(b) 13.2(c) 13.2(d) 13.3 13.4 13.5 |
| EMEA Spain CCN-STIC 825 | 6.4 [ORG.4] 8.2.1 [MP.PER.1] 8.2.2 [MP.PER.2] |
| EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 | 1102 2321 3101 3102 |
APAC (10)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC Australia ISM June 2024 | ISM-0717 ISM-0720 ISM-0724 ISM-0725 ISM-0726 ISM-0731 ISM-0732 ISM-0733 ISM-0734 ISM-0735 |
| APAC Australia Prudential Standard CPS234 | 14 |
| APAC China Data Security Law | 27 |
| APAC India DPDPA 2023 | 10(2)(a)(iv) 6(9) |
| APAC India SEBI CSCRF | DE.DP.S1 GV.RR.S2 PR.AT.S4 PR.AT.S5 RS.CO.S1 |
| APAC Japan APPI | 21 |
| APAC Japan ISMAP | 4.3.1 4.3.1.1 6.1.1 6.1.1.13.PB 6.1.3.13.PB 7.2 |
| APAC New Zealand HISF 2022 | HHSP02 HHSP23 HML02 HML23 HMS01 HSUP02 HSUP21 |
| APAC New Zealand HISF Suppliers 2023 | HSUP02 HSUP21 |
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 3.3.4.C.01 3.3.4.C.02 3.3.4.C.03 3.3.4.C.04 3.3.4.C.05 3.3.5.C.01 3.3.5.C.02 3.3.6.C.01 3.3.6.C.02 3.3.6.C.03 3.3.6.C.04 3.3.6.C.05 3.3.6.C.06 3.3.7.C.01 3.3.8.C.01 3.3.8.C.02 3.3.8.C.03 3.3.8.C.04 3.3.8.C.05 3.3.9.C.01 3.3.10.C.01 3.3.10.C.02 3.3.10.C.03 3.3.10.C.04 3.3.11.C.01 3.3.12.C.01 3.3.13.C.01 3.3.13.C.02 3.3.14.C.01 3.3.14.C.02 3.3.14.C.03 3.3.15.C.01 3.4.10.C.01 3.4.10.C.02 |
Americas (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada CSAG | 1.2 |
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.01.22.A 03.06.04.A 03.06.05.D 03.07.06.A 03.08.02 03.15.03.B 03.16.03.B |
| Americas Uruguay | 12 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to define cybersecurity responsibilities for all personnel.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Personnel management is decentralized, with the responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to the user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
- The Human Resources (HR) department provides guidance on HR practices for hiring, retaining and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization.
- Terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior are at the discretion of users’ management.
- Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Defines terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior.
- Personnel management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for personnel management.
- The Human Resources (HR) department:
- The responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
- Personnel managers ensure personnel are routinely made aware of the organization's cybersecurity / data privacy policies and provide acknowledgement.
- Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Ensures that every user accessing a system that processes, stores, or transmits sensitive/regulated data is cleared and regularly trained in proper data handling practices. o Identifies and implements industry-recognized HR practices related to cybersecurity and data privacy training and awareness to help ensure secure practices are implemented in personnel operations to help manage risk to both technology assets and data. o Manages personnel security risk by assigning a risk designation to all positions and establishing screening criteria for individuals filling those positions.
- The Human Resources (HR) department:
- Administrative processes require Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or similar confidentiality agreements that reflect the needs to protect data and operational details, for both employees and third-parties.
- Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to define cybersecurity responsibilities for all personnel.
Assessment Objectives
- HRS-03_A01 cybersecurity / data privacy roles and responsibilities are incorporated into organizational position descriptions.
- HRS-03_A02 the incident response plan is protected from unauthorized disclosure.
Evidence Requirements
- E-HRS-01 Position Categorization
-
Documented evidence of a discrete roles for cybersecurity & data privacy functions (e.g., position categorization).
Human Resources - E-HRS-02 Assigned Roles - Application Developers
-
List of employed or contract personnel assigned to application development roles.
Human Resources - E-HRS-03 Assigned Roles - Cybersecurity Staff
-
List of employed or contract personnel assigned to cybersecurity roles.
Human Resources - E-HRS-04 Assigned Roles - Data Privacy Staff
-
List of employed or contract personnel assigned to data privacy roles.
Human Resources - E-HRS-11 Role Assignment - Sensitive / Regulated Data
-
Documented evidence of a formal role assignment to personnel who are cleared to handle sensitive/regulated data.
Human Resources - E-HRS-13 Defined Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Responsibilities
-
Documented evidence of a role-based cybersecurity & data privacy responsibilities to ensure personnel are both educated on the role and are responsible for the associated control execution.
Human Resources - E-HRS-18 Provisioning Checklist (Onboarding)
-
Documented evidence of personnel management practices to formally onboard personnel into their assigned roles.
Human Resources - E-HRS-22 Rules of Behavior
-
Documented evidence of personnel management practices to define "acceptable use" or "rules of behavior" criteria that specify acceptable and unacceptable user behaviors.
Human Resources - E-HRS-28 Authorized Personnel Access List
-
Documented evidence of an authorized personnel access list.
Human Resources
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- NIST NICE cybersecurity workforce framework alignment
- Responsible, Accountable, Supporting, Consulted and Informed (RASCI) matrix
Small
- NIST NICE cybersecurity workforce framework alignment
- Responsible, Accountable, Supporting, Consulted and Informed (RASCI) matrix
Medium
- NIST NICE cybersecurity workforce framework alignment
- Responsible, Accountable, Supporting, Consulted and Informed (RASCI) matrix
Large
- NIST NICE cybersecurity workforce framework alignment
- Responsible, Accountable, Supporting, Consulted and Informed (RASCI) matrix
Enterprise
- NIST NICE cybersecurity workforce framework alignment
- Responsible, Accountable, Supporting, Consulted and Informed (RASCI) matrix