Skip to main content

HRS-03.1: User Awareness

HRS 9 — Critical Identify

Mechanisms exist to communicate with users about their roles and responsibilities to maintain a safe and secure working environment.

Control Question: Does the organization communicate with users about their roles and responsibilities to maintain a safe and secure working environment?

General (21)
Framework Mapping Values
COSO 2017 Principle 4
ISO 27001 2022 (source) 7.3 7.3(a) 7.3(b) 7.3(c)
ISO 27701 2025 7.3
ISO 42001 2023 7.3
NIST AI 100-1 (AI RMF) 1.0 GOVERN 4.1
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 GV.PO-P2
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.01.22.a 03.15.03.b
NIST CSF 2.0 (source) GV.RR-04
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 1.1.2 2.1.2 3.1.2 4.1.2 5.1.2 6.1.2 7.1.2 8.1.2 9.1.2 10.1.2 11.1.2 12.1.3 12.6.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) 12.1.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B (source) 12.1.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B-IP (source) 12.1.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) 12.1.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 1.1.2 2.1.2 3.1.2 4.1.2 5.1.2 6.1.2 7.1.2 8.1.2 9.1.2 10.1.2 11.1.2 12.1.3 12.6.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 1.1.2 2.1.2 3.1.2 4.1.2 5.1.2 6.1.2 7.1.2 8.1.2 9.1.2 10.1.2 11.1.2 12.1.3 12.6.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ P2PE (source) 12.1.3
TISAX ISA 6 2.1.3
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) HRS-03.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational HRS-03.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure HRS-03.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats HRS-03.1
US (6)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 WORKFORCE-1.E.MIL2 WORKFORCE-2.A.MIL1 WORKFORCE-2.B.MIL2 WORKFORCE-2.C.MIL2 WORKFORCE-2.D.MIL2 WORKFORCE-2.E.MIL3 WORKFORCE-2.F.MIL3 WORKFORCE-2.G.MIL3
US DHS CISA TIC 3.0 3.UNI.UATRA
US FCA CRM 609.930(c)(4)
US NERC CIP 2024 (source) CIP-004-7 2.2 CIP-004-7 R2
US NNPI (unclass) 2.1
US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 500.10(a)(2)
EMEA (4)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU NIS2 Annex 10.1.2(a) 10.1.2(c) 8.1.1
EMEA Spain BOE-A-2022-7191 13.1 15.1
EMEA Spain 311/2022 13.1 15.1
EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 2600 2603
APAC (3)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-0824
APAC India SEBI CSCRF GV.RR.S6 PR.AT.S4 PR.AT.S5
APAC Japan ISMAP 4.5.2 4.5.2.1 4.5.2.2 4.5.2.3 4.5.2.4 4.5.2.5 4.5.2.6 4.5.2.7 4.5.2.8
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.01.22.A 03.15.03.B

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to communicate with users about their roles and responsibilities to maintain a safe and secure working environment.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Personnel management is decentralized, with the responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to the user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
  • The Human Resources (HR) department provides guidance on HR practices for hiring, retaining and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization.
  • Terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior are at the discretion of users’ management.
  • Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Defines terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior.

  • Personnel management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for personnel management.
  • The Human Resources (HR) department:
  • The responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
  • Personnel managers ensure personnel are routinely made aware of the organization's cybersecurity / data privacy policies and provide acknowledgement.
  • Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
  • Administrative processes formally educate users about their duties to protect sensitive/regulated data.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Ensures that every user accessing a system that processes, stores, or transmits sensitive/regulated data is cleared and regularly trained in proper data handling practices. o Identifies and implements industry-recognized HR practices related to cybersecurity and data privacy training and awareness to help ensure secure practices are implemented in personnel operations to help manage risk to both technology assets and data. o Manages personnel security risk by assigning a risk designation to all positions and establishing screening criteria for individuals filling those positions.

  • The Human Resources (HR) department:
  • Administrative processes require Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or similar confidentiality agreements that reflect the needs to protect data and operational details, for both employees and third-parties.
  • Administrative processes formally educate users about their duties to protect sensitive/regulated data, which includes ensuring personnel receive recurring familiarization with the organization's cybersecurity and data privacy policies and provide acknowledgement.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to communicate with users about their roles and responsibilities to maintain a safe and secure working environment.

Assessment Objectives

  1. HRS-03.1_A01 users are formally made aware of their roles and responsibilities to maintain a safe and secure working environment.
  2. HRS-03.1_A02 acknowledgement of user awareness is maintained by the organization.

Evidence Requirements

E-HRS-01 Position Categorization

Documented evidence of a discrete roles for cybersecurity & data privacy functions (e.g., position categorization).

Human Resources
E-HRS-13 Defined Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Responsibilities

Documented evidence of a role-based cybersecurity & data privacy responsibilities to ensure personnel are both educated on the role and are responsible for the associated control execution.

Human Resources
E-HRS-16 Access Agreements

Documented evidence of personnel management practices protecting sensitive/regulated data through formal access agreements.

Human Resources
E-HRS-18 Provisioning Checklist (Onboarding)

Documented evidence of personnel management practices to formally onboard personnel into their assigned roles.

Human Resources

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Formal onboarding training
  • Acceptable Use / Rules of Behavior (RoB)

Small

  • Formal onboarding training
  • Acceptable Use / Rules of Behavior (RoB)

Medium

  • Formal onboarding training
  • Acceptable Use / Rules of Behavior (RoB)

Large

  • Formal onboarding training
  • Acceptable Use / Rules of Behavior (RoB)

Enterprise

  • Formal onboarding training
  • Acceptable Use / Rules of Behavior (RoB)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.