Skip to main content

HRS-04: Personnel Screening

HRS 10 — Critical Identify

Mechanisms exist to manage personnel security risk by screening individuals prior to authorizing access.

Control Question: Does the organization manage personnel security risk by screening individuals prior to authorizing access?

General (44)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC1.4-POF5
COSO 2017 Principle 4
CSA CCM 4 HRS-01
ENISA 2.0 SO5
GovRAMP Low PS-03
GovRAMP Low+ PS-03
GovRAMP Moderate PS-03
GovRAMP High PS-03
ISO 27001 2022 (source) 7.2(b) 7.2(c)
ISO 27002 2022 6.1
ISO 27017 2015 7.1 7.1.1
ISO 42001 2023 7.2
MPA Content Security Program 5.1 OR-3.0 OR-3.1
NIST 800-53 R4 PS-3
NIST 800-53 R4 (low) PS-3
NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) PS-3
NIST 800-53 R4 (high) PS-3
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) PS-3
NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) PS-3
NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) PS-3
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) PS-3
NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay PS-3
NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay PS-3
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay PS-3
NIST 800-161 R1 PS-3
NIST 800-161 R1 C-SCRM Baseline PS-3
NIST 800-161 R1 Flow Down PS-3
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 PS-3
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 PS-3
NIST 800-171 R2 (source) 3.9.1
NIST 800-171A (source) 3.9.1
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.09.01.a 03.09.01.b
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.09.01.ODP[01] A.03.09.01.a A.03.09.01.b A.03.09.02.b.01[01]
NIST 800-172 3.9.1e
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 12.7 12.7.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 12.7.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 12.7.1
SWIFT CSF 2023 5.3A
TISAX ISA 6 2.1.1
SCF CORE Fundamentals HRS-04
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) HRS-04
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational HRS-04
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure HRS-04
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats HRS-04
US (26)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 WORKFORCE-1.A.MIL1 WORKFORCE-1.F.MIL3
US CJIS Security Policy 5.9.3 (source) 5.12.1
US CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (source) PS.L2-3.9.1
US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) PS.L2-3.9.1
US CMS MARS-E 2.0 PS-3
US DHS ZTCF SEC-03
US FedRAMP R4 PS-3
US FedRAMP R4 (low) PS-3
US FedRAMP R4 (moderate) PS-3
US FedRAMP R4 (high) PS-3
US FedRAMP R4 (LI-SaaS) PS-3
US FedRAMP R5 (source) PS-3
US FedRAMP R5 (low) (source) PS-3
US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) PS-3
US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) PS-3
US FedRAMP R5 (LI-SaaS) (source) PS-3
US HIPAA Administrative Simplification 2013 (source) 164.312(d)
US HIPAA Security Rule / NIST SP 800-66 R2 (source) 164.312(d)
US IRS 1075 2.C.3 2.C.3.1 PS-3
US ITAR Part 120 120.15 120.16 120.39 120.40 120.41
US NERC CIP 2024 (source) CIP-004-7 3.1 CIP-004-7 3.2 CIP-004-7 3.2.1 CIP-004-7 3.2.2 CIP-004-7 3.3 CIP-004-7 3.4 CIP-004-7 3.5
US NISPOM 2020 8-103 8-104 8-307
US NNPI (unclass) 13.1
US - TX DIR Control Standards 2.0 PS-3
US - TX TX-RAMP Level 1 PS-3
US - TX TX-RAMP Level 2 PS-3
EMEA (8)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU NIS2 Annex 10.1.2(d) 10.2.1 10.2.2(a) 10.2.2(b)
EMEA Germany C5 2020 HR-01
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 19.2
EMEA Saudi Arabia CSCC-1 2019 1-5-1-1
EMEA Saudi Arabia ECC-1 2018 1-9-3 1-9-3-2
EMEA Saudi Arabia OTCC-1 2022 1-7-1
EMEA South Africa 19 20
EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 2700 2701
APAC (5)
Americas (3)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Bermuda BMACCC 5.13
Americas Canada CSAG 1.6
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.09.01.a 03.09.01.b

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to manage personnel security risk by screening individuals prior to authorizing access.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Personnel management is decentralized, with the responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to the user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
  • The Human Resources (HR) department provides guidance on HR practices for hiring, retaining and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization.
  • Terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior are at the discretion of users’ management.
  • Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Defines terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior.

  • Personnel management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for personnel management.
  • The Human Resources (HR) department:
  • The responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
  • Personnel managers ensure personnel are routinely made aware of the organization's cybersecurity / data privacy policies and provide acknowledgement.
  • Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Ensures that every user accessing a system that processes, stores, or transmits sensitive/regulated data is cleared and regularly trained in proper data handling practices. o Identifies and implements industry-recognized HR practices related to cybersecurity and data privacy training and awareness to help ensure secure practices are implemented in personnel operations to help manage risk to both technology assets and data. o Manages personnel security risk by assigning a risk designation to all positions and establishing screening criteria for individuals filling those positions.

  • The Human Resources (HR) department:
  • Administrative processes require Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or similar confidentiality agreements that reflect the needs to protect data and operational details, for both employees and third-parties.
  • Administrative processes evaluate personnel security risk by screening individuals prior to authorizing access.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to manage personnel security risk by screening individuals prior to authorizing access.

Assessment Objectives

  1. HRS-04_A01 conditions that require the rescreening of individuals are defined.
  2. HRS-04_A02 the frequency of rescreening individuals where it is so indicated is defined.
  3. HRS-04_A03 individuals are screened prior to authorizing access to the system.
  4. HRS-04_A04 individuals are rescreened in accordance with organization-defined conditions.
  5. HRS-04_A05 individuals are screened prior to authorizing access to organizational systems.
  6. HRS-04_A06 where rescreening is so indicated, individuals are rescreened per organization-defined frequency.
  7. HRS-04_A07 conditions that require the rescreening of individuals are defined.
  8. HRS-04_A08 individuals are rescreened in accordance with the following conditions: <A.03.09.01.ODP[01]: conditions>.
  9. HRS-04_A09 upon individual reassignment or transfer to other positions in the organization, the ongoing operational need for current logical and physical access authorizations to the system and facility is reviewed.

Evidence Requirements

E-HRS-17 Background Checks

Documented evidence of personnel screening practices, which centers around some form of formalized background check process.

Human Resources
E-HRS-21 Position Competency Requirements

Documented evidence of personnel management practices to define minimum competency requirements for cybersecurity & data privacy-related roles.

Human Resources

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Criminal, education and employment background checks
  • Professional references
  • Education / certification transcripts

Small

  • Criminal, education and employment background checks
  • Professional references
  • Education / certification transcripts

Medium

  • Criminal, education and employment background checks
  • Professional references
  • Education / certification transcripts

Large

  • Criminal, education and employment background checks
  • Professional references
  • Education / certification transcripts

Enterprise

  • Criminal, education and employment background checks
  • Professional references
  • Education / certification transcripts

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.