Skip to main content

HRS-04.1: Roles With Special Protection Measures

HRS 9 — Critical Identify

Mechanisms exist to ensure that individuals accessing a system that stores, transmits or processes information requiring special protection satisfy organization-defined personnel screening criteria.

Control Question: Does the organization ensure that individuals accessing a system that stores, transmits or processes information requiring special protection satisfy organization-defined personnel screening criteria?

General (25)
Framework Mapping Values
COBIT 2019 DSS06.03
COSO 2017 Principle 4
ENISA 2.0 SO5
GovRAMP High PS-03(03)
ISO 27002 2022 5.2 6.1
ISO 27701 2025 7.3
ISO 42001 2023 7.2 A.3.2
MPA Content Security Program 5.1 OR-3.0 OR-3.1
NIST AI 100-1 (AI RMF) 1.0 GOVERN 2.0 GOVERN 4.1
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 ID.IM-P2 CM.PO-P2
NIST 800-53 R4 PS-3(1) PS-3(3)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) PS-3(1) PS-3(3)
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) PS-3(1) PS-3(3)
NIST 800-171 R2 (source) 3.9.1
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.01.22.a 03.02.02.a.01 03.09.01.a 03.09.01.b
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.09.01.ODP[01]
NIST 800-172 3.9.1e
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 12.7 12.7.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 12.7.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 12.7.1
SWIFT CSF 2023 5.1 5.3A
TISAX ISA 6 2.1.1
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) HRS-04.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure HRS-04.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats HRS-04.1
US (14)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 WORKFORCE-1.F.MIL3
US CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (source) PS.L2-3.9.1
US DHS ZTCF SEC-03
US FedRAMP R4 PS-3(3)
US FedRAMP R4 (moderate) PS-3(3)
US FedRAMP R4 (high) PS-3(3)
US FedRAMP R5 (source) PS-3(3)
US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) PS-3(3)
US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) PS-3(3)
US FIPPS 2
US GLBA CFR 314 2023 (source) 314.4(e)(2)
US ITAR Part 120 120.15 120.16 120.39 120.40 120.41
US NNPI (unclass) 2.4 13.1
US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 500.10(a)(1)
EMEA (6)
APAC (3)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-0446 ISM-0447
APAC China Data Security Law 27
APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 3.5.2
Americas (2)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada CSAG 1.6
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.01.22.A 03.02.02.A.01 03.09.01.A 03.09.01.B

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to ensure that individuals accessing a system that stores, transmits or processes information requiring special protection satisfy organization-defined personnel screening criteria.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Personnel management is decentralized, with the responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to the user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
  • The Human Resources (HR) department provides guidance on HR practices for hiring, retaining and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization.
  • Terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior are at the discretion of users’ management.
  • Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Defines terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior.

  • Personnel management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for personnel management.
  • The Human Resources (HR) department:
  • The responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
  • Personnel managers ensure personnel are routinely made aware of the organization's cybersecurity / data privacy policies and provide acknowledgement.
  • Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Ensures that every user accessing a system that processes, stores, or transmits sensitive/regulated data is cleared and regularly trained in proper data handling practices. o Identifies and implements industry-recognized HR practices related to cybersecurity and data privacy training and awareness to help ensure secure practices are implemented in personnel operations to help manage risk to both technology assets and data. o Manages personnel security risk by assigning a risk designation to all positions and establishing screening criteria for individuals filling those positions.

  • The Human Resources (HR) department:
  • Administrative processes require Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or similar confidentiality agreements that reflect the needs to protect data and operational details, for both employees and third-parties.
  • Administrative processes evaluate personnel security risk by screening individuals prior to authorizing access.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to ensure that individuals accessing a system that stores, transmits or processes information requiring special protection satisfy organization-defined personnel screening criteria.

Assessment Objectives

  1. HRS-04.1_A01 enhanced personnel screening for individuals is defined.
  2. HRS-04.1_A02 the frequency with which to reassess individual positions and access to sensitive / regulated data is defined.
  3. HRS-04.1_A03 individuals that require enhanced personnel screening are identified.
  4. HRS-04.1_A04 positions that require access to sensitive / regulated data are identified.
  5. HRS-04.1_A05 enhanced personnel screening is conducted for individuals.
  6. HRS-04.1_A06 individual positions and access to sensitive / regulated data is reassessed per an organization-defined frequency.
  7. HRS-04.1_A07 individuals with access to sensitive / regulated data are identified.
  8. HRS-04.1_A08 adverse information about individuals with access to sensitive / regulated data is defined.
  9. HRS-04.1_A09 organizational systems to which individuals have access are identified.
  10. HRS-04.1_A10 mechanisms are in place to protect organizational systems if adverse information develops or is obtained about individuals with access to sensitive / regulated data.
  11. HRS-04.1_A11 individuals accessing a system, application or service processing, storing or transmitting sensitive / regulated data are cleared.
  12. HRS-04.1_A12 individuals accessing a system, application or service processing, storing or transmitting sensitive / regulated data are indoctrinated to the highest classification level of the information to which they have access on the system.
  13. HRS-04.1_A13 additional personnel screening criteria to be satisfied for individuals accessing a system, application or service processing, storing or transmitting information requiring special protection are defined.
  14. HRS-04.1_A14 individuals accessing a system, application or service processing, storing or transmitting information requiring special protection have valid access authorizations that are demonstrated by assigned duties.
  15. HRS-04.1_A15 individuals accessing a system, application or service processing, storing or transmitting information requiring special protection satisfy additional personnel screening criteria.
  16. HRS-04.1_A16 conditions that require the rescreening of individuals are defined.

Evidence Requirements

E-HRS-17 Background Checks

Documented evidence of personnel screening practices, which centers around some form of formalized background check process.

Human Resources
E-HRS-21 Position Competency Requirements

Documented evidence of personnel management practices to define minimum competency requirements for cybersecurity & data privacy-related roles.

Human Resources

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Criminal, education and employment background checks

Small

  • Criminal, education and employment background checks

Medium

  • Criminal, education and employment background checks

Large

  • Criminal, education and employment background checks

Enterprise

  • Criminal, education and employment background checks

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.