IAC-01.2: Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA)
Mechanisms exist to strictly govern the use of Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) solutions, both on-premises and those hosted by an External Service Provider (ESP).
Control Question: Does the organization strictly govern the use of Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) solutions, both on-premises and those hosted by an External Service Provider (ESP)?
General (24)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC6.1-POF3 CC6.1-POF4 CC6.6 CC6.6-POF2 CC6.6-POF3 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 | 12.5 5.6 6.6 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 | 6.6 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 | 6.6 |
| GovRAMP Core | IA-04 IA-04(04) |
| GovRAMP Low | IA-04 |
| GovRAMP Low+ | IA-04 |
| GovRAMP Moderate | IA-04 IA-04(04) |
| GovRAMP High | IA-04 IA-04(04) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | IA-4 IA-4(4) |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) | IA-4 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) | IA-4 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) | IA-4 IA-4(4) |
| NIST 800-161 R1 | IA-4 |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.05.01.a 03.05.02 03.05.05.d 03.05.07.a 03.05.07.b 03.05.07.c 03.05.07.d 03.05.07.e 03.05.12.d 03.05.12.f 03.07.05.a |
| NIST 800-171A R3 (source) | A.03.01.01.d.01 A.03.01.01.d.02 A.03.01.16.b A.03.05.01.a[01] A.03.05.01.a[02] |
| NIST 800-172 | 3.5.2e |
| NIST 800-207 | NIST Tenet 2 NIST Tenet 3 NIST Tenet 4 NIST Tenet 6 |
| NIST CSF 2.0 (source) | PR.AA PR.AA-03 PR.AA-04 PR.AA-05 |
| SPARTA | CM0031 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | IAC-01.2 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational | IAC-01.2 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | IAC-01.2 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | IAC-01.2 |
US (6)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CJIS Security Policy 5.9.3 (source) | IA-4 IA-4(4) |
| US DoD Zero Trust Execution Roadmap | 1.1.1 1.2.1 1.9 1.9.1 2.1.3 2.1.4 |
| US DHS CISA TIC 3.0 | 3.UNI.SAUTH 3.PEP.ID.EINVE |
| US DHS ZTCF | ACC-01 USR-01 USR-03 |
| US NERC CIP 2024 (source) | CIP-007-6 5.1 |
| US - CA CCPA 2025 | 7123(c)(1)(B) 7123(c)(3) |
EMEA (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA EU NIS2 Annex | 11.3.2(a) 11.4.2(c) 11.6.1 11.6.3 |
| EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 | 2200 2209 2210 2304 |
APAC (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC New Zealand HISF 2022 | HHSP39 HML39 HSUP34 |
| APAC New Zealand HISF Suppliers 2023 | HSUP34 |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.05.01.A 03.05.02 03.05.05.D 03.05.07.A 03.05.07.B 03.05.07.C 03.05.07.D 03.05.07.E 03.05.12.D 03.05.12.F 03.07.05.A |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to strictly govern the use of Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) solutions, both on-premises and those hosted by an External Service Provider (ESP).
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to strictly govern the use of Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) solutions, both on-premises and those hosted by an External Service Provider (ESP).
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Implement and maintain an Identity & Access Management (IAM) capability for all users to implement “least privileges” Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts. o Govern IAM technologies via RBAC to prohibit privileged access by non-organizational users, unless there is an explicit support contract for privileged IT support services.
- Logical Access Control (LAC) is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for logical access control.
- IT personnel:
- Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, is primarily used to centrally manage identities and permissions with RBAC. Due to technical or business limitations, asset/process owners are empowered to operate a decentralized access control program for their specific systems, applications and services that cannot be integrated into AD.
- IAM controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to manage accounts and permissions.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- An Identity & Access Management (IAM) function, or similar function, centrally manages permissions and implements “least privileges” Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts.
- The Human Resources (HR) department governs personnel management operations and notifies IAM personnel of personnel role changes for RBAC-based provisioning and deprovisioning actions.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and applies the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data that conform to industry-recognized standards for hardening (e.g., DISA STIGs, CIS Benchmarks or OEM security guides).
- An IT infrastructure team, or similar function, ensures that statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data privacy obligations are addressed to ensure secure configurations are designed, built and maintained.
- Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, is used to centrally manage identities and permissions. Only by exception due to a technical or business limitation are solutions authorized to operate a decentralized access control program for systems, applications and services.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to strictly govern the use of Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) solutions, both on-premises and those hosted by an External Service Provider (ESP).
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to strictly govern the use of Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) solutions, both on-premises and those hosted by an External Service Provider (ESP).
Assessment Objectives
- IAC-01.2_A01 access to the system is authorized based on a valid access authorization.
- IAC-01.2_A02 system users are uniquely identified.
- IAC-01.2_A03 system users are authenticated.
- IAC-01.2_A04 an inventory of Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) solutions exists, including instances on-premises and hosted by an External Service Provider (ESP).
- IAC-01.2_A05 procedures exist to govern on-premises Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) solutions by assigned stakeholders.
- IAC-01.2_A06 contracts with External Service Providers (ESPs) contain explicit governance requirements for ESP-controlled Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) solutions.
- IAC-01.2_A07 access to the system is authorized based on intended system usage.
- IAC-01.2_A08 each type of wireless access to the system is authorized prior to establishing such connections.
Evidence Requirements
- E-IAM-06 Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) Solution
-
Documented evidence of an Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) solution (on-premises and hosted by External Service Providers (ESP)).
Identity & Access Management
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Microsoft Active Directory (https://microsoft.com)
- Microsoft Entra (https://microsoft.com)
- AWS IAM (https://aws.amazon.com)
Small
- Microsoft Active Directory (https://microsoft.com)
- Microsoft Entra (https://microsoft.com)
- AWS IAM (https://aws.amazon.com)
Medium
- Microsoft Active Directory (https://microsoft.com)
- Microsoft Entra (https://microsoft.com)
- AWS IAM (https://aws.amazon.com)
Large
- Microsoft Active Directory (https://microsoft.com)
- Microsoft Entra (https://microsoft.com)
- AWS IAM (https://aws.amazon.com)
Enterprise
- Microsoft Active Directory (https://microsoft.com)
- Microsoft Entra (https://microsoft.com)
- AWS IAM (https://aws.amazon.com)