IRO-02.4: Incident Classification & Prioritization
Mechanisms exist to identify classes of incidents and actions to take to ensure the continuation of organizational missions and business functions.
Control Question: Does the organization identify classes of incidents and actions to take to ensure the continuation of organizational missions and business functions?
General (13)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC2.2-POF10 CC7.3-POF7 |
| GovRAMP High | IR-04(03) |
| IMO Maritime Cyber Risk Management | 3.5.4 |
| NIST AI 100-1 (AI RMF) 1.0 | GOVERN 6.2 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | IR-4(3) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | IR-4(3) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | IR-4(3) |
| NIST CSF 2.0 (source) | DE.AE DE.AE-02 DE.AE-04 DE.AE-06 DE.AE-08 RS.AN-08 RS.MA-03 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) | 12.10 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | IRO-02.4 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational | IRO-02.4 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | IRO-02.4 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | IRO-02.4 |
US (5)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US DoD Zero Trust Execution Roadmap | 6.7.2 |
| US DHS ZTCF | SEC-02 |
| US NERC CIP 2024 (source) | CIP-008-6 1.1 CIP-008-6 1.2.1 CIP-008-6 1.2.2 |
| US SEC Cybersecurity Rule | Form 8-K Item 1.05(a) |
| US - CA CCPA 2025 | 7123(c)(17)(A) |
EMEA (4)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA EU NIS2 | 23.3 23.3(a) 23.3(b) |
| EMEA EU NIS2 Annex | 3.1.2(a) 3.4.1 3.4.2(a) |
| EMEA Spain BOE-A-2022-7191 | 33.4 |
| EMEA Spain 311/2022 | 33.4 |
APAC (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC India SEBI CSCRF | RS.AN.S2 |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada OSFI B-13 | 2.7 3.4.2 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to identify classes of incidents and actions to take to ensure the continuation of organizational missions and business functions.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Incident Response (IRO) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- IT personnel use an informal process to facilitate incident management operations that cover preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
- Incident response operations are decentralized.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Incident Response (IRO) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for incident response operations. o Implement and maintain an incident response capability using a documented and tested Incident Response Plan (IRP) to facilitate incident management operations that cover preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
- Incident response operations are decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel:
Level 3 — Well Defined
Incident Response (IR) processes are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- An Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT), or similar function, exists to form an on-demand, scalable and integrated team of formally-assigned cybersecurity, IT, data privacy and business function representatives that can perform coordinated incident response.
- The ISIRT, or similar function, develops and maintains a documented, program-level Integrated Incident Response Program (IIRP) that provides operational and tactical-level guidance for cybersecurity and data privacy response operations.
- A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar function, facilitates incident management operations that includes preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
- Business Process Owners (BPOs), in conjunction with the SOC and ISIRT functions, develop and maintain a documented Incident Response Plan (IRP) specific to the business process / business unit but inclusive of the organization's larger approach to incident response operations.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and provides that information to the SOC for Incident Response Operations (IRO).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to identify classes of incidents and actions to take to ensure the continuation of organizational missions and business functions.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to identify classes of incidents and actions to take to ensure the continuation of organizational missions and business functions.
Assessment Objectives
- IRO-02.4_A01 classes of incidents requiring an organization-defined action to be taken are defined.
- IRO-02.4_A02 classes of incidents are identified.
- IRO-02.4_A03 actions to be taken in response to organization-defined classes of incidents are defined.
- IRO-02.4_A04 actions are taken in response to those incidents to ensure the continuation of organizational mission and business functions.
Evidence Requirements
- E-IRO-01 Incident Response Program (IRP)
-
Documented evidence of a Incident Response Plan (IRP). This is program-level documentation in the form of a runbook, playbook or a similar format provides guidance on organizational practices that support existing policies and standards.
Incident Response
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- National Cyber Incident Scoring
Small
- National Cyber Incident Scoring
Medium
- National Cyber Incident Scoring
Large
- National Cyber Incident Scoring
Enterprise
- National Cyber Incident Scoring