IRO-03: Indicators of Compromise (IOC)
Mechanisms exist to define specific Indicators of Compromise (IOC) to identify the signs of potential cybersecurity events.
Control Question: Does the organization define specific Indicators of Compromise (IOC) to identify the signs of potential cybersecurity events?
General (11)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| COBIT 2019 | DSS02.01 |
| CSA IoT SCF 2 | IAM-09 MON-02 MON-09 |
| ISO/SAE 21434 2021 | RQ-08-02 |
| NIST 800-171 R2 (source) | 3.14.7 |
| NIST CSF 2.0 (source) | DE.CM |
| Shared Assessments SIG 2025 | J.5 |
| TISAX ISA 6 | 1.6.1 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | IRO-03 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational | IRO-03 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | IRO-03 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | IRO-03 |
US (9)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US C2M2 2.1 | SITUATION-2.D.MIL2 SITUATION-2.E.MIL2 SITUATION-2.F.MIL2 SITUATION-2.G.MIL3 SITUATION-2.H.MIL3 SITUATION-2.I.MIL3 RESPONSE-1.D.MIL3 RESPONSE-1.E.MIL3 RESPONSE-1.F.MIL3 |
| US CISA CPG 2022 | 3.A |
| US CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (source) | SI.L2-3.14.7 |
| US DHS CISA TIC 3.0 | 3.UNI.DTDIS |
| US DHS ZTCF | SEC-02 SEC-05 TRF-01 |
| US FFIEC | D1.RM.RMP.A.4 D5.IR.Te.E.1 D5.ER.Es.E.1 |
| US HIPAA HICP Medium Practice | 8.M.A 8.M.B |
| US HIPAA HICP Large Practice | 8.M.A 8.M.B |
| US NERC CIP 2024 (source) | CIP-008-6 1.2.1 CIP-008-6 1.2.2 |
EMEA (4)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Germany Banking Supervisory Requirements for IT (BAIT) | 5.4 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia OTCC-1 2022 | 2-3-1-12 |
| EMEA UK CAF 4.0 | C1.f |
| EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 | 3201 |
APAC (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 7.2.17.C.01 7.2.17.C.02 |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada OSFI B-13 | 2.7.2 3.1 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to define specific Indicators of Compromise (IOC) to identify the signs of potential cybersecurity events.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Incident Response (IRO) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- IT personnel use an informal process to facilitate incident management operations that cover preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
- Incident response operations are decentralized.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Incident Response (IRO) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for incident response operations. o Implement and maintain an incident response capability using a documented and tested Incident Response Plan (IRP) to facilitate incident management operations that cover preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
- Incident response operations are decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel:
Level 3 — Well Defined
Incident Response (IR) processes are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- An Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT), or similar function, exists to form an on-demand, scalable and integrated team of formally-assigned cybersecurity, IT, data privacy and business function representatives that can perform coordinated incident response.
- The ISIRT, or similar function, develops and maintains a documented, program-level Integrated Incident Response Program (IIRP) that provides operational and tactical-level guidance for cybersecurity and data privacy response operations.
- A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar function, facilitates incident management operations that includes preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
- Business Process Owners (BPOs), in conjunction with the SOC and ISIRT functions, develop and maintain a documented Incident Response Plan (IRP) specific to the business process / business unit but inclusive of the organization's larger approach to incident response operations.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and provides that information to the SOC for Incident Response Operations (IRO).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to define specific Indicators of Compromise (IOC) to identify the signs of potential cybersecurity events.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to define specific Indicators of Compromise (IOC) to identify the signs of potential cybersecurity events.
Assessment Objectives
- IRO-03_A01 anomalous or suspicious behavior is defined.
- IRO-03_A02 environments or resources which may contain or may be related to anomalous or suspected adversarial behavior are defined.
- IRO-03_A03 anomalous or suspected adversarial behavior in or related to organization-defined environments or resources are analyzed.
- IRO-03_A04 organizational systems and system components are monitored on an ongoing basis for anomalous or suspicious behavior.
Evidence Requirements
- E-IRO-02 Indicators of Compromise (IOC)
-
Documented evidence of defined Indicators of Compromise (IOC).
Incident Response
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Indicators of Compromise (IoC)
Small
- Indicators of Compromise (IoC)
Medium
- Indicators of Compromise (IoC)
Large
- Indicators of Compromise (IoC)
Enterprise
- Indicators of Compromise (IoC)