Skip to main content

IRO-07: Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT)

IRO 9 — Critical Respond

Mechanisms exist to establish an integrated team of cybersecurity, IT and business function representatives that are capable of addressing cybersecurity and data protection incident response operations.

Control Question: Does the organization establish an integrated team of cybersecurity, IT and business function representatives that are capable of addressing cybersecurity and data protection incident response operations?

General (30)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC2.2-POF6 CC7.4 CC7.4-POF1
CIS CSC 8.1 17.1 17.4 17.5 17.6 17.9
CIS CSC 8.1 IG1 17.1
CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 17.1 17.4 17.5 17.6 17.7
CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 17.1 17.4 17.5 17.6 17.7 17.9
COBIT 2019 DSS02.05
CSA IoT SCF 2 IMT-01
ENISA 2.0 SO16
ISO 27002 2022 5.25 5.26
ISO 27017 2015 16.1.4
NIST 800-53 R4 IR-10
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) IR-4(11)
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) IR-4(11)
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay IR-4(11)
NIST 800-161 R1 IR-4(11)
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 IR-4(11)
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.06.02.b A.03.06.02.d
NIST 800-172 3.6.2e
NIST CSF 2.0 (source) DE.AE-06 RS RS.MA RS.MA-01 RS.MA-04
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 12.10.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) 12.10.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) 12.10.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 12.10.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 12.10.3
SWIFT CSF 2023 7.1
TISAX ISA 6 1.6.3
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) IRO-07
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational IRO-07
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure IRO-07
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats IRO-07
US (14)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 SITUATION-3.G.MIL3
US CERT RMM 1.2 IMC:SG1.SP2 OPD:SG1.SP6
US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) IR.L3-3.6.2E
US DHS ZTCF SEC-02
US FedRAMP R4 IR-7(2)
US FedRAMP R5 (source) IR-4(11)
US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) IR-4(11)
US FFIEC D5.ER.Es.Int.3 D5.IR.Pl.Int.1 D5.IR.Pl.B.3 D5.ER.Is.B.1 D5.IR.Pl.Int.1
US GLBA CFR 314 2023 (source) 314.4(h)(3)
US HIPAA HICP Medium Practice 8.M.A 8.M.B
US HIPAA HICP Large Practice 8.M.A 8.M.B
US NERC CIP 2024 (source) CIP-008-6 1.3
US SEC Cybersecurity Rule Form 8-K Item 1.05(a)
US - TX BC521 521.053
EMEA (7)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU EBA GL/2019/04 3.5.1(60)(d) 3.5.1(60)(d)(i)
EMEA EU DORA 14.1 14.2 14.3
EMEA EU NIS2 Annex 3.1.2(c) 3.1.3 3.5.3(a) 4.3.3
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 24.7 24.9
EMEA Saudi Arabia SACS-002 TPC-89
EMEA Spain BOE-A-2022-7191 33.3
EMEA Spain 311/2022 33.3
APAC (5)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-0733 ISM-1618
APAC Australia Prudential Standard CPS234 23 24 25(a) 25(b)
APAC Japan ISMAP 16.1.4
APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 7.2.18.C.01
APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 7.7.5
Americas (2)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada CSAG 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8
Americas Canada OSFI B-13 2.7.2 3.3.3 3.4.4

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to establish an integrated team of cybersecurity, IT and business function representatives that are capable of addressing cybersecurity and data protection incident response operations.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to establish an integrated team of cybersecurity, IT and business function representatives that are capable of addressing cybersecurity and data protection incident response operations.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Incident Response (IRO) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for incident response operations. o Implement and maintain an incident response capability using a documented and tested Incident Response Plan (IRP) to facilitate incident management operations that cover preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.

  • Incident response operations are decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel:
Level 3 — Well Defined

Incident Response (IR) processes are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT), or similar function, exists to form an on-demand, scalable and integrated team of formally-assigned cybersecurity, IT, data protection and business function representatives that can perform coordinated incident response.
  • The ISIRT, or similar function, develops and maintains a documented, program-level Integrated Incident Response Program (IIRP) that provides operational and tactical-level guidance for cybersecurity and data protection response operations.
  • A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar function, facilitates incident management operations that includes preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
  • Business Process Owners (BPOs), in conjunction with the SOC and ISIRT functions, develop and maintain a documented Incident Response Plan (IRP) specific to the business process / business unit but inclusive of the organization's larger approach to incident response operations.
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and provides that information to the SOC for Incident Response Operations (IRO).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Incident Response (IR) is metrics driven and provides sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to establish an integrated team of cybersecurity, IT and business function representatives that are capable of addressing cybersecurity and data protection incident response operations.

Assessment Objectives

  1. IRO-07_A01 an integrated incident response team is established and maintained.
  2. IRO-07_A02 the time period within which an integrated incident response team can be deployed is defined.
  3. IRO-07_A03 the cyber incident response team can be deployed by the organization within an organization-defined time period.
  4. IRO-07_A04 suspected incidents are reported to the organizational incident response capability within an organization-defined time period.
  5. IRO-07_A05 an incident response support resource that offers advice and assistance to system users on handling and reporting incidents is provided.
  6. IRO-07_A06 a time period for deploying a cyber incident response team is defined.
  7. IRO-07_A07 the cyber incident response team can be deployed by the organization within an organization-defined time period.
  8. IRO-07_A08 the cyber incident response team is maintained.
  9. IRO-07_A09 suspected incidents are reported to the organizational incident response capability within <A.03.06.02.ODP[01]: time period>.

Evidence Requirements

E-IRO-01 Incident Response Program (IRP)

Documented evidence of a Incident Response Plan (IRP). This is program-level documentation in the form of a runbook, playbook or a similar format provides guidance on organizational practices that support existing policies and standards.

Incident Response
E-IRO-09 Formally Assigned Incident Response Roles & Responsibilities

Documented evidence of the establishment of a formally-assigned, integrated team of cybersecurity, IT and business function representatives that are capable of addressing cybersecurity & data privacy incident response operations.

Incident Response

Technology Recommendations

Medium

  • Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT)

Large

  • Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT)

Enterprise

  • Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.