Skip to main content

IRO-08: Chain of Custody & Forensics

IRO 9 — Critical Respond

Mechanisms exist to perform digital forensics and maintain the integrity of the chain of custody, in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and industry-recognized secure practices.

Control Question: Does the organization perform digital forensics and maintain the integrity of the chain of custody, in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and industry-recognized secure practices?

General (19)
Framework Mapping Values
CSA IoT SCF 2 IMT-01
IMO Maritime Cyber Risk Management 3.5.5.2
ISO 27002 2022 5.26 5.28
ISO 27017 2015 16.1.7
MPA Content Security Program 5.1 OR-4.0
NIST 800-53 R4 AU-10(3)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) AU-10(3) IR-4(12)
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) AU-10(3) IR-4(12)
NIST 800-161 R1 AU-10(3)
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 AU-10(3)
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 AU-10(3)
NIST CSF 2.0 (source) RS.AN RS.AN-06 RS.AN-07
SWIFT CSF 2023 7.1
UN R155 7.3.7(c)
UN ECE WP.29 7.3.7(c)
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) IRO-08
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational IRO-08
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure IRO-08
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats IRO-08
US (6)
Framework Mapping Values
US DFARS Cybersecurity 252.204-70xx 252.204-7018(e)
US DHS ZTCF SEC-02
US FFIEC D3.CC.Re.Int.3 D3.CC.Re.Int.4
US HIPAA HICP Medium Practice 8.M.A 8.M.B
US HIPAA HICP Large Practice 8.M.A 8.M.B
US NERC CIP 2024 (source) CIP-008-6 2.3 CIP-009-6 1.5
EMEA (3)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Germany C5 2020 SIM-03
EMEA Saudi Arabia SACS-002 TPC-89
EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 3104
APAC (6)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-0137 ISM-0138 ISM-1609 ISM-1731 ISM-1732
APAC India SEBI CSCRF RS.AN.S3
APAC Japan ISMAP 16.1.7 16.1.7.13.PB
APAC New Zealand HISF 2022 HHSP74 HML74 HSUP66
APAC New Zealand HISF Suppliers 2023 HSUP66
APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 7.3.11.C.01
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada OSFI B-13 3.4.5

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to perform digital forensics and maintain the integrity of the chain of custody, in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and industry-recognized secure practices.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to perform digital forensics and maintain the integrity of the chain of custody, in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and industry-recognized secure practices.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Incident Response (IRO) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for incident response operations. o Implement and maintain an incident response capability using a documented and tested Incident Response Plan (IRP) to facilitate incident management operations that cover preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.

  • Incident response operations are decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel:
Level 3 — Well Defined

Incident Response (IR) processes are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT), or similar function, exists to form an on-demand, scalable and integrated team of formally-assigned cybersecurity, IT, data privacy and business function representatives that can perform coordinated incident response.
  • The ISIRT, or similar function, develops and maintains a documented, program-level Integrated Incident Response Program (IIRP) that provides operational and tactical-level guidance for cybersecurity and data privacy response operations.
  • A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar function, facilitates incident management operations that includes preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
  • Business Process Owners (BPOs), in conjunction with the SOC and ISIRT functions, develop and maintain a documented Incident Response Plan (IRP) specific to the business process / business unit but inclusive of the organization's larger approach to incident response operations.
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and provides that information to the SOC for Incident Response Operations (IRO).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to perform digital forensics and maintain the integrity of the chain of custody, in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and industry-recognized secure practices.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to perform digital forensics and maintain the integrity of the chain of custody, in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and industry-recognized secure practices.

Assessment Objectives

  1. IRO-08_A01 reviewer or releaser credentials are maintained within the established chain of custody for information reviewed or released.

Evidence Requirements

E-IRO-01 Incident Response Program (IRP)

Documented evidence of a Incident Response Plan (IRP). This is program-level documentation in the form of a runbook, playbook or a similar format provides guidance on organizational practices that support existing policies and standards.

Incident Response
E-IRO-10 Chain of Custody

Documented evidence of an in-house, or externally contracted, capability to perform digital forensics and maintain the integrity of the chain of custody, in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and industry-recognized secure practices.

Incident Response

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Third-party advisors (e.g., virtual CISO, Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP), etc.)

Small

  • Third-party advisors (e.g., virtual CISO, Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP), etc.)

Medium

  • Chain of custody procedures
  • OpenText Encase (https://opentext.com)
  • AccessData Forensic Toolkit (FTK) (https://pluralsight.com)
  • Extero (https://exterro.com)

Large

  • Chain of custody procedures
  • OpenText Encase (https://opentext.com)
  • AccessData Forensic Toolkit (FTK) (https://pluralsight.com)
  • Extero (https://exterro.com)

Enterprise

  • Chain of custody procedures
  • OpenText Encase (https://opentext.com)
  • AccessData Forensic Toolkit (FTK) (https://pluralsight.com)
  • Extero (https://exterro.com)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.