Skip to main content

IRO-09.1: Automated Tracking, Data Collection & Analysis

IRO 1 — Low Detect

Automated mechanisms exist to assist in the tracking, collection and analysis of information from actual and potential cybersecurity and data protection incidents.

Control Question: Does the organization use automated mechanisms to assist in the tracking, collection and analysis of information from actual and potential cybersecurity and data protection incidents?

General (6)
Framework Mapping Values
GovRAMP High IR-05(01)
NIST 800-53 R4 IR-5(1)
NIST 800-53 R4 (high) IR-5(1)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) IR-5(1)
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) IR-5(1)
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay IR-5(1)
US (4)
Framework Mapping Values
US FedRAMP R4 IR-5(1)
US FedRAMP R4 (high) IR-5(1)
US FedRAMP R5 (source) IR-5(1)
US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) IR-5(1)
EMEA (1)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 24.5

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to assist in the tracking, collection and analysis of information from actual and potential cybersecurity and data protection incidents.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to assist in the tracking, collection and analysis of information from actual and potential cybersecurity and data protection incidents.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to assist in the tracking, collection and analysis of information from actual and potential cybersecurity and data protection incidents.

Level 3 — Well Defined

Incident Response (IR) processes are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT), or similar function, exists to form an on-demand, scalable and integrated team of formally-assigned cybersecurity, IT, data protection and business function representatives that can perform coordinated incident response.
  • The ISIRT, or similar function, develops and maintains a documented, program-level Integrated Incident Response Program (IIRP) that provides operational and tactical-level guidance for cybersecurity and data protection response operations.
  • A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar function, facilitates incident management operations that includes preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
  • Business Process Owners (BPOs), in conjunction with the SOC and ISIRT functions, develop and maintain a documented Incident Response Plan (IRP) specific to the business process / business unit but inclusive of the organization's larger approach to incident response operations.
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and provides that information to the SOC for Incident Response Operations (IRO).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Incident Response (IR) is metrics driven and provides sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

Incident Response (IRO) efforts are “world-class” capabilities that leverage predictive analysis (e.g., machine learning, AI, etc.). In addition to CMM Level 4 criteria, CMM Level 5 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Stakeholders make time-sensitive decisions to support operational efficiency, which may include automated remediation actions.
  • Based on predictive analysis, process improvements are implemented according to “continuous improvement” practices that affect process changes.

Assessment Objectives

  1. IRO-09.1_A01 automated mechanisms used to track incidents are defined.
  2. IRO-09.1_A02 automated mechanisms used to collect incident information are defined.
  3. IRO-09.1_A03 automated mechanisms used to analyze incident information are defined.
  4. IRO-09.1_A04 incidents are tracked using automated mechanisms.
  5. IRO-09.1_A05 incident information is collected using automated mechanisms.
  6. IRO-09.1_A06 incident information is analyzed using automated mechanisms.

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.