IRO-09.1: Automated Tracking, Data Collection & Analysis
Automated mechanisms exist to assist in the tracking, collection and analysis of information from actual and potential cybersecurity and data protection incidents.
Control Question: Does the organization use automated mechanisms to assist in the tracking, collection and analysis of information from actual and potential cybersecurity and data protection incidents?
General (6)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| GovRAMP High | IR-05(01) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | IR-5(1) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (high) | IR-5(1) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | IR-5(1) |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) | IR-5(1) |
| NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay | IR-5(1) |
US (4)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US FedRAMP R4 | IR-5(1) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (high) | IR-5(1) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (source) | IR-5(1) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) | IR-5(1) |
EMEA (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 24.5 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to assist in the tracking, collection and analysis of information from actual and potential cybersecurity and data protection incidents.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to assist in the tracking, collection and analysis of information from actual and potential cybersecurity and data protection incidents.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to assist in the tracking, collection and analysis of information from actual and potential cybersecurity and data protection incidents.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Incident Response (IR) processes are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- An Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT), or similar function, exists to form an on-demand, scalable and integrated team of formally-assigned cybersecurity, IT, data protection and business function representatives that can perform coordinated incident response.
- The ISIRT, or similar function, develops and maintains a documented, program-level Integrated Incident Response Program (IIRP) that provides operational and tactical-level guidance for cybersecurity and data protection response operations.
- A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar function, facilitates incident management operations that includes preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
- Business Process Owners (BPOs), in conjunction with the SOC and ISIRT functions, develop and maintain a documented Incident Response Plan (IRP) specific to the business process / business unit but inclusive of the organization's larger approach to incident response operations.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and provides that information to the SOC for Incident Response Operations (IRO).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Incident Response (IR) is metrics driven and provides sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
Incident Response (IRO) efforts are “world-class” capabilities that leverage predictive analysis (e.g., machine learning, AI, etc.). In addition to CMM Level 4 criteria, CMM Level 5 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Stakeholders make time-sensitive decisions to support operational efficiency, which may include automated remediation actions.
- Based on predictive analysis, process improvements are implemented according to “continuous improvement” practices that affect process changes.
Assessment Objectives
- IRO-09.1_A01 automated mechanisms used to track incidents are defined.
- IRO-09.1_A02 automated mechanisms used to collect incident information are defined.
- IRO-09.1_A03 automated mechanisms used to analyze incident information are defined.
- IRO-09.1_A04 incidents are tracked using automated mechanisms.
- IRO-09.1_A05 incident information is collected using automated mechanisms.
- IRO-09.1_A06 incident information is analyzed using automated mechanisms.