MNT-06.2: Non-System Related Maintenance
Mechanisms exist to ensure that non-escorted personnel performing non-IT maintenance activities in the physical proximity of systems have required access authorizations.
Control Question: Does the organization ensure that non-escorted personnel performing non-IT maintenance activities in the physical proximity of systems have required access authorizations?
General (8)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| NIST 800-53 R4 | MA-5(5) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | MA-5(5) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | MA-5(5) |
| NIST 800-171 R2 (source) | 3.7.6 |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.07.06.a 03.07.06.c |
| NIST 800-171A R3 (source) | A.03.07.06.c |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | MNT-06.2 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | MNT-06.2 |
US (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (source) | MA.L2-3.7.6 |
| US IRS 1075 | MA-5(5) |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.07.06.A 03.07.06.C |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to ensure that non-escorted personnel performing non-IT maintenance activities in the physical proximity of systems have required access authorizations.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Maintenance (MNT) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- IT personnel use an informal process to implement secure and timely technology asset-specific maintenance operations, including preventative and reactive maintenance operations.
- Facilities management uses an informal process to facilitate the secure and timely implementation of non-IT maintenance operations, including preventative and reactive maintenance operations.
- Maintenance operations are decentralized both in terms of change management and execution.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Maintenance (MNT) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to appropriately address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for technology asset maintenance. o Develop and disseminate formal guidance to facilitate a localized/regionalized process to implement secure and timely technology asset-specific maintenance operations, including preventative and reactionary maintenance operations.
- Technology asset maintenance is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel:
- Maintenance controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to manage change control processes associated with maintenance operations.
- Asset custodians develop and maintain formalized procedures to conduct controlled and timely maintenance activities throughout the lifecycle of the system, application or service.
- Maintenance operations may be centralized for certain locations (e.g., datacenters) and decentralized for other locations, both in terms of change management and execution.
- Facilities management uses a localized/regionalized process to facilitate the secure and timely implementation of non-IT maintenance operations, including preventative and reactionary maintenance operations.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Maintenance (MNT) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- IT/cybersecurity personnel develop and disseminate formal practices to implement enterprise-wide capability to conduct secure and timely technology asset-specific maintenance operations, including preventative and reactionary maintenance operations.
- Technology asset-related maintenance operations are centralized in terms of change management and governance. Local/regional practices fall under the broader enterprise-wide technology asset maintenance program.
- Facilities management uses an enterprise-wide process to facilitate the secure and timely implementation of non-IT maintenance operations, including preventative and reactionary maintenance operations. Local/regional practices fall under the broader enterprise-wide facilities management program.
- A Change Control Board (CCB), or similar function, centrally manages the process of IT and non-IT maintenance operations to reduce the chance of business interruptions from maintenance operations.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to ensure that non-escorted personnel performing non-IT maintenance activities in the physical proximity of systems have required access authorizations.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to ensure that non-escorted personnel performing non-IT maintenance activities in the physical proximity of systems have required access authorizations.
Assessment Objectives
- MNT-06.2_A01 non-escorted personnel performing maintenance activities not directly associated with the system but in the physical proximity of the system have required access authorizations.
- MNT-06.2_A02 non-escorted personnel who perform maintenance on the system possess the required access authorizations.