MON-02.5: Permitted Actions
Mechanisms exist to specify the permitted actions for both users and Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) associated with the review, analysis and reporting of audit information.
Control Question: Does the organization specify the permitted actions for both users and Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) associated with the review, analysis and reporting of audit information?
General (6)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| CSA CCM 4 | LOG-09 |
| CSA IoT SCF 2 | MON-04 |
| GovRAMP High | AU-06(07) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | AU-6(7) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | AU-6(7) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | AU-6(7) |
US (5)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US FedRAMP R4 | AU-6(7) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (high) | AU-6(7) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (source) | AU-6(7) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) | AU-6(7) |
| US IRS 1075 | AU-6(7) |
EMEA (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Saudi Arabia CSCC-1 2019 | 2-3-1-8 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to specify the permitted actions for both users and Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) associated with the review, analysis and reporting of audit information.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to specify the permitted actions for both users and Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) associated with the review, analysis and reporting of audit information.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for situational awareness management. o Configure alerts for critical or sensitive data that is stored, transmitted and processed on assets. o Use a structured process to review and analyze logs.
- Situational awareness management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel:
- A log aggregator, or similar automated tool, provides an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities on business-critical Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS).
Level 3 — Well Defined
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Governs asset management that ensures compliance with requirements for asset management. o Leverages a Configuration Management Database (CMDB), or similar tool, as the authoritative source of IT assets. o Centrally collects logs and is protected according to the manufacturer’s security guidelines to protect the integrity of the event logs with cryptographic mechanisms. o Monitors the organization for Indicators of Compromise (IoC) and provides 24x7x365 near real-time alerting capability. o Is configured to alert incident response personnel of detected suspicious events such that incident responders can look to terminate suspicious events.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function:
- A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool:
- Both inbound and outbound network traffic is monitored for unauthorized activities to identify prohibited activities and assist incident handlers with identifying potentially compromised Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to specify the permitted actions for both users and Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) associated with the review, analysis and reporting of audit information.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to specify the permitted actions for both users and Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS) associated with the review, analysis and reporting of audit information.
Assessment Objectives
- MON-02.5_A01 the permitted actions for each organization-defined criteria (e.g., system process, role or user) associated with the review, analysis and reporting of audit record information are specified.
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
Small
- Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
Medium
- Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
Large
- Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
Enterprise
- Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)