Skip to main content

MON-03.1: Sensitive Audit Information

MON 8 — High Detect

Mechanisms exist to protect sensitive/regulated data contained in log files.

Control Question: Does the organization protect sensitive/regulated data contained in log files?

General (16)
Framework Mapping Values
CIS CSC 8.1 3.14
CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 3.14
CSA CCM 4 LOG-02
GovRAMP Low+ AU-06(01)
GovRAMP Moderate AU-03(01) AU-06(01)
GovRAMP High AU-03(01) AU-06(01)
NIST 800-53 R4 AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
NIST 800-53 R4 (high) AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
NIST 800-171 R2 (source) 3.3.8
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) MON-03.1
US (12)
Framework Mapping Values
US CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (source) AU.L2-3.3.8
US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) AU.L2-3.3.8
US CMS MARS-E 2.0 AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
US FedRAMP R4 AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
US FedRAMP R4 (moderate) AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
US FedRAMP R4 (high) AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
US FedRAMP R5 (source) AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
US IRS 1075 AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
US SSA EIESR 8.0 5.4 5.6
US - TX TX-RAMP Level 2 AU-3(1) AU-6(1)
EMEA (1)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 21.4

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to protect sensitive/regulated data contained in log files.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Generating event logs and the review of event logs is narrowly-focused to business-critical systems and/ or systems that store, processes and/ or transmit sensitive/regulated data.
  • Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for situational awareness management. o Configure alerts for critical or sensitive data that is stored, transmitted and processed on assets. o Use a structured process to review and analyze logs.

  • Situational awareness management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel:
  • A log aggregator, or similar automated tool, provides an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities on business-critical systems.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Governs asset management that ensures compliance with requirements for asset management. o Leverages a Configuration Management Database (CMDB), or similar tool, as the authoritative source of IT assets. o Centrally collects logs and is protected according to the manufacturer’s security guidelines to protect the integrity of the event logs with cryptographic mechanisms. o Monitors the organization for Indicators of Compromise (IoC) and provides 24x7x365 near real-time alerting capability. o Is configured to alert incident response personnel of detected suspicious events such that incident responders can look to terminate suspicious events.

  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function:
  • A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool:
  • Both inbound and outbound network traffic is monitored for unauthorized activities to identify prohibited activities and assist incident handlers with identifying potentially compromised systems.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to protect sensitive/regulated data contained in log files.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to protect sensitive/regulated data contained in log files.

Assessment Objectives

  1. MON-03.1_A01 additional information to be included in audit records is defined.
  2. MON-03.1_A02 generated audit records contain the following organization-defined additional information.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Role Based Access Control (RBAC)

Small

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Role Based Access Control (RBAC)

Medium

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Role Based Access Control (RBAC)

Large

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Role Based Access Control (RBAC)

Enterprise

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Role Based Access Control (RBAC)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.