Skip to main content

MON-03.3: Privileged Functions Logging

MON 8 — High Detect

Mechanisms exist to log and review the actions of users and/or services with elevated privileges.

Control Question: Does the organization log and review the actions of users and/or services with elevated privileges?

General (20)
Framework Mapping Values
CIS CSC 8.1 8.8
CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 8.8
CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 8.8
CSA CCM 4 IAM-09 IAM-10 IAM-11
ISO 27002 2022 8.15
ISO 27017 2015 12.4.3
NIST 800-53 R4 AU-6(8)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) AU-6(8)
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) AU-6(8)
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.01.07.b
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.01.07.b
OWASP Top 10 2021 A09:2021
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 10.2.1.1 10.2.1.2 10.2.1.3 10.2.1.4 10.2.1.5 10.2.1.6 10.2.1.7
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) 10.2.1.1 10.2.1.2 10.2.1.3 10.2.1.4 10.2.1.5 10.2.1.6 10.2.1.7
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) 10.2.1.2 10.2.1.4 10.2.1.5
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 10.2.1.1 10.2.1.2 10.2.1.3 10.2.1.4 10.2.1.5 10.2.1.6 10.2.1.7
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 10.2.1.1 10.2.1.2 10.2.1.3 10.2.1.4 10.2.1.5 10.2.1.6 10.2.1.7
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) MON-03.3
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure MON-03.3
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats MON-03.3
US (2)
Framework Mapping Values
US SSA EIESR 8.0 5.3
US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 500.7(c)
EMEA (5)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU NIS2 Annex 11.5.2(d)
EMEA Germany C5 2020 OPS-16
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 21.10 21.21
EMEA Saudi Arabia ECC-1 2018 2-12-3-2
EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 2216
APAC (3)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia Essential 8 ML2-P4 ML3-P4 ML3-P7
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-1537
APAC Japan ISMAP 12.4.3
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.01.07.B

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to log and review the actions of users and/ or services with elevated privileges.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Generating event logs and the review of event logs is narrowly-focused to business-critical systems and/ or systems that store, processes and/ or transmit sensitive/regulated data.
  • Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for situational awareness management. o Configure alerts for critical or sensitive data that is stored, transmitted and processed on assets. o Use a structured process to review and analyze logs.

  • Situational awareness management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel:
  • A log aggregator, or similar automated tool, provides an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities on business-critical systems.
  • Logs of privileged functions (e.g., administrator or root actions) are reviewed for evidence of unauthorized activities.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Governs asset management that ensures compliance with requirements for asset management. o Leverages a Configuration Management Database (CMDB), or similar tool, as the authoritative source of IT assets. o Centrally collects logs and is protected according to the manufacturer’s security guidelines to protect the integrity of the event logs with cryptographic mechanisms. o Monitors the organization for Indicators of Compromise (IoC) and provides 24x7x365 near real-time alerting capability. o Is configured to alert incident response personnel of detected suspicious events such that incident responders can look to terminate suspicious events.

  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function:
  • A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool:
  • Both inbound and outbound network traffic is monitored for unauthorized activities to identify prohibited activities and assist incident handlers with identifying potentially compromised systems.
  • Human Resources (HR) and Legal departments determine what is legally-allowable to support enhanced monitoring for individuals who pose a greater risk to the organization, including privileged users.
  • A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar capability, configures monitoring technologies to implement the enhanced monitoring profiles for selected users and establish a reporting capability to designated personnel.
  • Logs of privileged functions (e.g., administrator or root actions) are reviewed for evidence of unauthorized activities.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to log and review the actions of users and/ or services with elevated privileges.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to log and review the actions of users and/ or services with elevated privileges.

Assessment Objectives

  1. MON-03.3_A01 a full text analysis of logged privileged commands in a physically distinct component or subsystem of the system or other system that is dedicated to that analysis is performed.
  2. MON-03.3_A02 the execution of privileged functions is logged.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)

Small

  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)

Medium

  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)

Large

  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)

Enterprise

  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.