MON-03.3: Privileged Functions Logging
Mechanisms exist to log and review the actions of users and/or services with elevated privileges.
Control Question: Does the organization log and review the actions of users and/or services with elevated privileges?
General (20)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| CIS CSC 8.1 | 8.8 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 | 8.8 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 | 8.8 |
| CSA CCM 4 | IAM-09 IAM-10 IAM-11 |
| ISO 27002 2022 | 8.15 |
| ISO 27017 2015 | 12.4.3 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | AU-6(8) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | AU-6(8) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | AU-6(8) |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.01.07.b |
| NIST 800-171A R3 (source) | A.03.01.07.b |
| OWASP Top 10 2021 | A09:2021 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) | 10.2.1.1 10.2.1.2 10.2.1.3 10.2.1.4 10.2.1.5 10.2.1.6 10.2.1.7 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) | 10.2.1.1 10.2.1.2 10.2.1.3 10.2.1.4 10.2.1.5 10.2.1.6 10.2.1.7 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) | 10.2.1.2 10.2.1.4 10.2.1.5 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) | 10.2.1.1 10.2.1.2 10.2.1.3 10.2.1.4 10.2.1.5 10.2.1.6 10.2.1.7 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) | 10.2.1.1 10.2.1.2 10.2.1.3 10.2.1.4 10.2.1.5 10.2.1.6 10.2.1.7 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | MON-03.3 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | MON-03.3 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | MON-03.3 |
US (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US SSA EIESR 8.0 | 5.3 |
| US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 | 500.7(c) |
EMEA (5)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA EU NIS2 Annex | 11.5.2(d) |
| EMEA Germany C5 2020 | OPS-16 |
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 21.10 21.21 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia ECC-1 2018 | 2-12-3-2 |
| EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 | 2216 |
APAC (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC Australia Essential 8 | ML2-P4 ML3-P4 ML3-P7 |
| APAC Australia ISM June 2024 | ISM-1537 |
| APAC Japan ISMAP | 12.4.3 |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.01.07.B |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to log and review the actions of users and/ or services with elevated privileges.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Generating event logs and the review of event logs is narrowly-focused to business-critical systems and/ or systems that store, processes and/ or transmit sensitive/regulated data.
- Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for situational awareness management. o Configure alerts for critical or sensitive data that is stored, transmitted and processed on assets. o Use a structured process to review and analyze logs.
- Situational awareness management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel:
- A log aggregator, or similar automated tool, provides an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities on business-critical systems.
- Logs of privileged functions (e.g., administrator or root actions) are reviewed for evidence of unauthorized activities.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Governs asset management that ensures compliance with requirements for asset management. o Leverages a Configuration Management Database (CMDB), or similar tool, as the authoritative source of IT assets. o Centrally collects logs and is protected according to the manufacturer’s security guidelines to protect the integrity of the event logs with cryptographic mechanisms. o Monitors the organization for Indicators of Compromise (IoC) and provides 24x7x365 near real-time alerting capability. o Is configured to alert incident response personnel of detected suspicious events such that incident responders can look to terminate suspicious events.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function:
- A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool:
- Both inbound and outbound network traffic is monitored for unauthorized activities to identify prohibited activities and assist incident handlers with identifying potentially compromised systems.
- Human Resources (HR) and Legal departments determine what is legally-allowable to support enhanced monitoring for individuals who pose a greater risk to the organization, including privileged users.
- A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar capability, configures monitoring technologies to implement the enhanced monitoring profiles for selected users and establish a reporting capability to designated personnel.
- Logs of privileged functions (e.g., administrator or root actions) are reviewed for evidence of unauthorized activities.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to log and review the actions of users and/ or services with elevated privileges.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to log and review the actions of users and/ or services with elevated privileges.
Assessment Objectives
- MON-03.3_A01 a full text analysis of logged privileged commands in a physically distinct component or subsystem of the system or other system that is dedicated to that analysis is performed.
- MON-03.3_A02 the execution of privileged functions is logged.
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
Small
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
Medium
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
Large
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
Enterprise
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)