MON-04: Event Log Storage Capacity
Mechanisms exist to allocate and proactively manage sufficient event log storage capacity to reduce the likelihood of such capacity being exceeded.
Control Question: Does the organization allocate and proactively manage sufficient event log storage capacity to reduce the likelihood of such capacity being exceeded?
General (20)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| CIS CSC 8.1 | 8.3 8.10 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 | 8.10 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 | 8.10 |
| GovRAMP Low | AU-04 |
| GovRAMP Low+ | AU-04 |
| GovRAMP Moderate | AU-04 |
| GovRAMP High | AU-04 |
| IEC 62443-4-2 2019 | CR 2.9 (6.11.1) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | AU-4 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (low) | AU-4 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) | AU-4 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (high) | AU-4 AU-5(1) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | AU-4 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) | AU-4 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) | AU-4 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) | AU-4 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay | AU-4 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay | AU-4 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay | AU-4 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | MON-04 |
US (17)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CERT RMM 1.2 | TM:SG5.SP3 |
| US CMS MARS-E 2.0 | AU-4 |
| US FedRAMP R4 | AU-4 AU-5(1) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (low) | AU-4 |
| US FedRAMP R4 (moderate) | AU-4 |
| US FedRAMP R4 (high) | AU-4 AU-5(1) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (LI-SaaS) | AU-4 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (source) | AU-4 AU-5(1) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (low) (source) | AU-4 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) | AU-4 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) | AU-4 AU-5(1) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (LI-SaaS) (source) | AU-4 |
| US IRS 1075 | AU-4 |
| US NISPOM 2020 | 8-602 |
| US - TX DIR Control Standards 2.0 | AU-4 |
| US - TX TX-RAMP Level 1 | AU-4 |
| US - TX TX-RAMP Level 2 | AU-4 |
EMEA (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 21.8 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia ECC-1 2018 | 2-12-3-5 |
APAC (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 16.6.13.C.01 16.6.13.C.02 16.6.13.C.03 16.6.13.C.04 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to allocate and proactively manage sufficient event log storage capacity to reduce the likelihood of such capacity being exceeded.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to allocate and proactively manage sufficient event log storage capacity to reduce the likelihood of such capacity being exceeded.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for situational awareness management. o Configure alerts for critical or sensitive data that is stored, transmitted and processed on assets. o Use a structured process to review and analyze logs.
- Situational awareness management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel:
- A log aggregator, or similar automated tool, provides an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities on business-critical systems.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Governs asset management that ensures compliance with requirements for asset management. o Leverages a Configuration Management Database (CMDB), or similar tool, as the authoritative source of IT assets. o Centrally collects logs and is protected according to the manufacturer’s security guidelines to protect the integrity of the event logs with cryptographic mechanisms. o Monitors the organization for Indicators of Compromise (IoC) and provides 24x7x365 near real-time alerting capability. o Is configured to alert incident response personnel of detected suspicious events such that incident responders can look to terminate suspicious events.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function:
- A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool:
- Both inbound and outbound network traffic is monitored for unauthorized activities to identify prohibited activities and assist incident handlers with identifying potentially compromised systems.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to allocate and proactively manage sufficient event log storage capacity to reduce the likelihood of such capacity being exceeded.
Assessment Objectives
- MON-04_A01 event log retention requirements are defined.
- MON-04_A02 event log storage capacity is allocated to accommodate organization-defined event log retention requirements.
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
- ITIL 4 (https://axelos.com)
Small
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
- ITIL 4 (https://axelos.com)
Medium
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
- ITIL 4 (https://axelos.com)
Large
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
- ITIL 4 (https://axelos.com)
Enterprise
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
- ITIL 4 (https://axelos.com)