Skip to main content

MON-06: Monitoring Reporting

MON 7 — High Detect

Mechanisms exist to provide an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities.

Control Question: Does the organization provide an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities?

General (32)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC7.2 CC7.3
CSA CCM 4 LOG-13
GovRAMP Core AU-07 AU-07(01)
GovRAMP Low AU-12
GovRAMP Low+ AU-12
GovRAMP Moderate AU-07 AU-07(01) AU-12
GovRAMP High AU-07 AU-07(01) AU-12
ISO 27002 2022 6.8 8.15
NIST 800-53 R4 AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
NIST 800-53 R4 (low) AU-12
NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
NIST 800-53 R4 (high) AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) AU-12
NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay AU-12
NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
NIST 800-161 R1 AU-12
NIST 800-161 R1 C-SCRM Baseline AU-12
NIST 800-161 R1 Flow Down AU-12
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 AU-12
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 AU-12
NIST 800-171 R2 (source) 3.3.6
NIST 800-171A (source) 3.3.6[a] 3.3.6[b]
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.03.05.b 03.03.06.a
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.03.05.b A.03.03.06.a[01] A.03.03.06.a[02] A.03.03.06.a[03] A.03.03.06.a[04]
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) MON-06
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational MON-06
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure MON-06
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats MON-06
US (23)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 SITUATION-3.B.MIL2 SITUATION-3.C.MIL2
US CERT RMM 1.2 COMP:SG3.SP2 TM:SG2.SP2
US CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (source) AU.L2-3.3.6
US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) AU.L2-3.3.6
US CMS MARS-E 2.0 AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
US DHS CISA TIC 3.0 3.UNL.CMREP
US FedRAMP R4 AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
US FedRAMP R4 (low) AU-12
US FedRAMP R4 (moderate) AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
US FedRAMP R4 (high) AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
US FedRAMP R4 (LI-SaaS) AU-12
US FedRAMP R5 (source) AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
US FedRAMP R5 (low) (source) AU-12
US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
US FedRAMP R5 (LI-SaaS) (source) AU-12
US FFIEC D3.DC.Ev.B.2 D5.ER.Is.B.1 D5.ER.Is.E.1
US IRS 1075 AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
US NISPOM 2020 8-602
US SSA EIESR 8.0 5.6
US - TX DIR Control Standards 2.0 AU-12
US - TX TX-RAMP Level 1 AU-12
US - TX TX-RAMP Level 2 AU-7 AU-7(1) AU-12
EMEA (2)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 21.3 21.11 21.19 21.20
EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 3108
APAC (2)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-1660
APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 12.2.6
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.03.05.B 03.03.06.A

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to provide an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to provide an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for situational awareness management. o Configure alerts for critical or sensitive data that is stored, transmitted and processed on assets. o Use a structured process to review and analyze logs.

  • Situational awareness management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel:
  • A log aggregator, or similar automated tool, provides an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities on business-critical systems.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Governs asset management that ensures compliance with requirements for asset management. o Leverages a Configuration Management Database (CMDB), or similar tool, as the authoritative source of IT assets. o Centrally collects logs and is protected according to the manufacturer’s security guidelines to protect the integrity of the event logs with cryptographic mechanisms. o Monitors the organization for Indicators of Compromise (IoC) and provides 24x7x365 near real-time alerting capability. o Is configured to alert incident response personnel of detected suspicious events such that incident responders can look to terminate suspicious events.

  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function:
  • A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool:
  • Both inbound and outbound network traffic is monitored for unauthorized activities to identify prohibited activities and assist incident handlers with identifying potentially compromised systems.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to provide an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to provide an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities.

Assessment Objectives

  1. MON-06_A01 system components that provide an audit record generation capability for the events types are defined.
  2. MON-06_A02 audit records include organization-defined audit record content requirements.
  3. MON-06_A03 personnel or roles allowed to select the event types that are to be logged by specific components of the system is/are defined.
  4. MON-06_A04 an audit record reduction and report generation capability is implemented that supports on-demand audit record review, analysis and reporting requirements and after-the-fact investigations of incidents that does not alter the original content or time ordering of audit records.
  5. MON-06_A05 fields within audit records that can be processed, sorted or searched are defined.
  6. MON-06_A06 findings are reported to organizational personnel or roles.
  7. MON-06_A07 an audit record reduction and report generation capability that supports audit record review is implemented.
  8. MON-06_A08 an audit record reduction and report generation capability that supports audit record analysis is implemented.
  9. MON-06_A09 an audit record reduction and report generation capability that supports audit record reporting requirements is implemented.
  10. MON-06_A10 an audit record reduction and report generation capability that supports after-the-fact investigations of incidents is implemented.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)

Small

  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)

Medium

  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)

Large

  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)

Enterprise

  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.