MON-06.2: Trend Analysis Reporting
Mechanisms exist to employ trend analyses to determine if security control implementations, the frequency of continuous monitoring activities, and/or the types of activities used in the continuous monitoring process need to be modified based on empirical data.
Control Question: Does the organization employ trend analyses to determine if security control implementations, the frequency of continuous monitoring activities, and/or the types of activities used in the continuous monitoring process need to be modified based on empirical data?
General (6)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| GovRAMP High | CA-07(03) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | CA-7(3) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | CA-7(3) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | CA-7(3) |
| NIST 800-161 R1 | CA-7(3) |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 | CA-7(3) |
US (4)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US C2M2 2.1 | SITUATION-3.B.MIL2 SITUATION-3.C.MIL2 SITUATION-3.D.MIL3 |
| US DoD Zero Trust Execution Roadmap | 7.1.3 |
| US FedRAMP R4 | CA-7(3) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (high) | CA-7(3) |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to employ trend analyses to determine if security control implementations, the frequency of continuous monitoring activities, and/ or the types of activities used in the continuous monitoring process need to be modified based on empirical data.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to employ trend analyses to determine if security control implementations, the frequency of continuous monitoring activities, and/ or the types of activities used in the continuous monitoring process need to be modified based on empirical data.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to employ trend analyses to determine if security control implementations, the frequency of continuous monitoring activities, and/ or the types of activities used in the continuous monitoring process need to be modified based on empirical data.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Governs asset management that ensures compliance with requirements for asset management. o Leverages a Configuration Management Database (CMDB), or similar tool, as the authoritative source of IT assets. o Centrally collects logs and is protected according to the manufacturer’s security guidelines to protect the integrity of the event logs with cryptographic mechanisms. o Monitors the organization for Indicators of Compromise (IoC) and provides 24x7x365 near real-time alerting capability. o Is configured to alert incident response personnel of detected suspicious events such that incident responders can look to terminate suspicious events.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function:
- A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool:
- Both inbound and outbound network traffic is monitored for unauthorized activities to identify prohibited activities and assist incident handlers with identifying potentially compromised systems.
- Administrative processes exist and a SIEM, or similar automated tool, is configured to perform trend analysis to assist in the determination if security control implementations, the frequency of continuous monitoring activities, and/ or the types of activities used in the continuous monitoring process need to be modified based on empirical data.
- The organization sets specific parameters on what type of audit information is permitted to be shared and what cannot be shared with third-parties, even with a NDA in place.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to employ trend analyses to determine if security control implementations, the frequency of continuous monitoring activities, and/ or the types of activities used in the continuous monitoring process need to be modified based on empirical data.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to employ trend analyses to determine if security control implementations, the frequency of continuous monitoring activities, and/ or the types of activities used in the continuous monitoring process need to be modified based on empirical data.
Assessment Objectives
- MON-06.2_A01 trend analysis is employed to determine if control implementations used in the continuous monitoring process need to be modified based on empirical data.
- MON-06.2_A02 trend analysis is employed to determine if the frequency of continuous monitoring activities used in the continuous monitoring process needs to be modified based on empirical data.
- MON-06.2_A03 trend analysis is employed to determine if the types of activities used in the continuous monitoring process need to be modified based on empirical data.
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
Small
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
Medium
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
Large
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
Enterprise
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)