Skip to main content

MON-14.1: Sharing of Event Logs

MON 5 — Medium Detect

Mechanisms exist to share event logs with third-party organizations based on specific cross-organizational sharing agreements.

Control Question: Does the organization share event logs with third-party organizations based on specific cross-organizational sharing agreements?

General (7)
Framework Mapping Values
NIST 800-53 R4 AU-16(2)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) AU-16(2)
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) AU-16(2)
NIST 800-161 R1 AU-16(2)
NIST 800-161 R1 Flow Down AU-16(2)
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 AU-16(2)
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 AU-16(2)
US (1)
Framework Mapping Values
US IRS 1075 AU-16(2)

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to share event logs with third-party organizations based on specific cross-organizational sharing agreements.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to share event logs with third-party organizations based on specific cross-organizational sharing agreements.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for situational awareness management. o Configure alerts for critical or sensitive data that is stored, transmitted and processed on assets. o Use a structured process to review and analyze logs.

  • Situational awareness management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel:
  • A log aggregator, or similar automated tool, provides an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities on business-critical systems.
  • A formal agreement exists between the organization and applicable third-parties that includes a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) addressing shared sensitive data.
  • the organization sets specific parameters on what type of audit information is permitted to be shared and what cannot be shared with third-parties, even with a NDA in place.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Governs asset management that ensures compliance with requirements for asset management. o Leverages a Configuration Management Database (CMDB), or similar tool, as the authoritative source of IT assets. o Centrally collects logs and is protected according to the manufacturer’s security guidelines to protect the integrity of the event logs with cryptographic mechanisms. o Monitors the organization for Indicators of Compromise (IoC) and provides 24x7x365 near real-time alerting capability. o Is configured to alert incident response personnel of detected suspicious events such that incident responders can look to terminate suspicious events.

  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function:
  • A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool:
  • Both inbound and outbound network traffic is monitored for unauthorized activities to identify prohibited activities and assist incident handlers with identifying potentially compromised systems.
  • A formal agreement exists between the organization and applicable third-parties that includes a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) addressing shared sensitive data.
  • The organization sets specific parameters on what type of audit information is permitted to be shared and what cannot be shared with third-parties, even with a NDA in place.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to share event logs with third-party organizations based on specific cross-organizational sharing agreements.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to share event logs with third-party organizations based on specific cross-organizational sharing agreements.

Assessment Objectives

  1. MON-14.1_A01 organizations with which cross-organizational audit information is to be shared are defined.
  2. MON-14.1_A02 cross-organizational sharing agreements to be used when providing cross-organizational audit information to organizations are defined.
  3. MON-14.1_A03 cross-organizational audit information is provided to organization-defined organizations based on organization-defined cross-organizational sharing agreements.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Vocabulary for Event Recording and Incident Sharing (VERIS) (https://verisframework.org)

Small

  • Vocabulary for Event Recording and Incident Sharing (VERIS) (https://verisframework.org)

Medium

  • Vocabulary for Event Recording and Incident Sharing (VERIS) (https://verisframework.org)

Large

  • Vocabulary for Event Recording and Incident Sharing (VERIS) (https://verisframework.org)

Enterprise

  • Vocabulary for Event Recording and Incident Sharing (VERIS) (https://verisframework.org)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.