Skip to main content

NET-06.4: Segregation From Enterprise Services

NET 4 — Medium Protect

Mechanisms exist to isolate sensitive/regulated data enclaves (secure zones) from corporate-provided IT resources by providing enclave-specific IT services (e.g., directory services, DNS, NTP, ITAM, antimalware, patch management, etc.) to those isolated network segments.

Control Question: Does the organization isolate sensitive/regulated data enclaves (secure zones) from corporate-provided IT resources by providing enclave-specific IT services (e.g., directory services, DNS, NTP, ITAM, antimalware, patch management, etc.) to those isolated network segments?

General (3)
Framework Mapping Values
NIST 800-172 3.14.3e
SWIFT CSF 2023 1.5
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats NET-06.4
US (2)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 ARCHITECTURE-2.J.MIL3 ARCHITECTURE-2.K.MIL3
US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) SI.L3-3.14.3E
EMEA (1)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Saudi Arabia OTCC-1 2022 2-2-1-1 2-4-1-3 2-4-1-9 2-4-1-10 2-4-1-11 2-4-1-12 2-4-1-13
APAC (1)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-1385

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to isolate sensitive/regulated data enclaves (secure zones) from corporate-provided IT resources by providing enclave-specific IT services (e.g., directory services, DNS, NTP, ITAM, antimalware, patch management, etc.) to those isolated network segments.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to isolate sensitive/regulated data enclaves (secure zones) from corporate-provided IT resources by providing enclave-specific IT services (e.g., directory services, DNS, NTP, ITAM, antimalware, patch management, etc.) to those isolated network segments.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to isolate sensitive/regulated data enclaves (secure zones) from corporate-provided IT resources by providing enclave-specific IT services (e.g., directory services, DNS, NTP, ITAM, antimalware, patch management, etc.) to those isolated network segments.

Level 3 — Well Defined

Network Security (NET) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • A Technology Infrastructure team, or similar function, defines centrally-managed network security controls for implementation across the enterprise.
  • Secure engineering principles are used to design and implement network security controls (e.g., industry-recognized secure practices) to enforce the concepts of least privilege and least functionality at the network level.
  • IT/cybersecurity architects work with the Technology Infrastructure team to implement a “layered defense” network architecture that provides a defense-in-depth approach for redundancy and risk reduction for network-based security controls, including wired and wireless networking.
  • Administrative processes and technologies configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
  • Technologies automate the Access Control Lists (ACLs) and similar rulesets review process to identify security issues and/ or misconfigurations.
  • Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to isolate sensitive/regulated data enclaves (secure zones) from corporate-provided IT resources by providing enclave-specific IT services (e.g., directory services, DNS, NTP, ITAM, Anti-malware, patch management, etc.) to those isolated network segments.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to isolate sensitive/regulated data enclaves (secure zones) from corporate-provided IT resources by providing enclave-specific IT services (e.g., directory services, DNS, NTP, ITAM, antimalware, patch management, etc.) to those isolated network segments.

Assessment Objectives

  1. NET-06.4_A01 sensitive / regulated data enclaves (secure zones) are isolated from corporate-provided IT resources by providing enclave-specific IT services (e.g., directory services, DNS, NTP, ITAM, antimalware, patch management, etc.) to those isolated network segments.

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.