Skip to main content

NET-09: Session Integrity

NET 8 — High Protect

Mechanisms exist to protect the authenticity and integrity of communications sessions.

Control Question: Does the organization protect the authenticity and integrity of communications sessions?

General (22)
Framework Mapping Values
GovRAMP Moderate SC-23
GovRAMP High SC-23
IEC 62443-4-2 2019 CR 3.8 (7.10.1(a)) CR 3.8 (7.10.1(b)) CR 3.8 (7.10.1(c))
MITRE ATT&CK 10 T1071, T1071.001, T1071.002, T1071.003, T1071.004, T1185, T1535, T1550.004, T1557, T1557.001, T1557.002, T1562.006, T1562.009, T1563.001, T1573, T1573.001, T1573.002
NIST 800-53 R4 SC-23
NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) SC-23
NIST 800-53 R4 (high) SC-23
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) SC-23
NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) SC-23
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) SC-23
NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay SC-23
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay SC-23
NIST 800-171 R2 (source) 3.13.15
NIST 800-171A (source) 3.13.15
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.13.15
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.13.15
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 1.4.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) 1.4.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 1.4.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 1.4.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure NET-09
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats NET-09
US (12)
EMEA (3)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Germany C5 2020 PSS-06
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 17.25
EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 2414
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.13.15

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to protect the authenticity and integrity of communications sessions.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Network Security (NET) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • IT personnel use an informal process to design, build and maintain secure networks for test, development, staging and production environments, including the implementation of appropriate cybersecurity and data protection controls.
  • Administrative processes are used to configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
  • Network monitoring is primarily reactive in nature.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Network Security (NET) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Network security management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for network security management.
  • IT personnel define secure networking practices to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's technology assets, data and network(s).
  • Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
  • Administrative processes are used to configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
  • Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
Level 3 — Well Defined

Network Security (NET) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • A Technology Infrastructure team, or similar function, defines centrally-managed network security controls for implementation across the enterprise.
  • Secure engineering principles are used to design and implement network security controls (e.g., industry-recognized secure practices) to enforce the concepts of least privilege and least functionality at the network level.
  • IT/cybersecurity architects work with the Technology Infrastructure team to implement a “layered defense” network architecture that provides a defense-in-depth approach for redundancy and risk reduction for network-based security controls, including wired and wireless networking.
  • Administrative processes and technologies configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
  • Technologies automate the Access Control Lists (ACLs) and similar rulesets review process to identify security issues and/ or misconfigurations.
  • Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to protect the authenticity and integrity of communications sessions.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to protect the authenticity and integrity of communications sessions.

Assessment Objectives

  1. NET-09_A01 the authenticity of communications sessions is protected.
  2. NET-09_A02 the confidentiality and/or integrity of information is/are maintained during preparation for transmission.
  3. NET-09_A03 the confidentiality and/or integrity of information is/are maintained during reception.

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.