Skip to main content

NET-09.1: Invalidate Session Identifiers at Logout

NET 5 — Medium Protect

Automated mechanisms exist to invalidate session identifiers upon user logout or other session termination.

Control Question: Does the organization use automated mechanisms to invalidate session identifiers upon user logout or other session termination?

General (4)
Framework Mapping Values
GovRAMP High SC-23(01)
NIST 800-53 R4 SC-23(1)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) SC-23(1)
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) SC-23(1)
US (3)
Framework Mapping Values
US FedRAMP R4 SC-23(1)
US FedRAMP R4 (high) SC-23(1)
US IRS 1075 SC-23(1)
EMEA (1)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Germany C5 2020 PSS-06

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to invalidate session identifiers up on user logout or other session termination.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to invalidate session identifiers up on user logout or other session termination.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Network Security (NET) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Network security management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for network security management.
  • IT personnel define secure networking practices to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's technology assets, data and network(s).
  • Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
  • Administrative processes are used to configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
  • Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
Level 3 — Well Defined

Network Security (NET) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • A Technology Infrastructure team, or similar function, defines centrally-managed network security controls for implementation across the enterprise.
  • Secure engineering principles are used to design and implement network security controls (e.g., industry-recognized secure practices) to enforce the concepts of least privilege and least functionality at the network level.
  • IT/cybersecurity architects work with the Technology Infrastructure team to implement a “layered defense” network architecture that provides a defense-in-depth approach for redundancy and risk reduction for network-based security controls, including wired and wireless networking.
  • Administrative processes and technologies configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
  • Technologies automate the Access Control Lists (ACLs) and similar rulesets review process to identify security issues and/ or misconfigurations.
  • Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to invalidate session identifiers up on user logout or other session termination.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to invalidate session identifiers up on user logout or other session termination.

Assessment Objectives

  1. NET-09.1_A01 session identifiers are invalidated upon user logout or other session termination.

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.