Skip to main content

NET-12: Safeguarding Data Over Open Networks

NET 8 — High Protect

Cryptographic mechanisms exist to implement strong cryptography and security protocols to safeguard sensitive/regulated data during transmission over open, public networks.

Control Question: Are cryptographic mechanisms utilized to implement strong cryptography and security protocols to safeguard sensitive/regulated data during transmission over open, public networks?

General (28)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC6.6 CC6.6-POF2
GovRAMP Core AC-02 SI-03 SI-04 SI-07
GovRAMP Low AC-02 AC-03 SI-03 SI-04 SI-05
GovRAMP Low+ AC-02 AC-03 AC-05 SI-03 SI-04 SI-05 SI-07 SI-10
GovRAMP Moderate AC-02 AC-03 AC-05 SI-03 SI-04 SI-05 SI-07 SI-10
GovRAMP High AC-02 AC-03 AC-05 SI-03 SI-04 SI-05 SI-07 SI-10
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7 SI-10
NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) AC-2 AC-3 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5
NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7 SI-10
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7 SI-10
NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay AC-2 AC-3 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5
NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7 SI-10
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7 SI-10
NIST 800-161 R1 AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7
NIST 800-161 R1 C-SCRM Baseline AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7
NIST 800-161 R1 Flow Down AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 1 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 4.1 4.2.1 11.2
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) 4.2.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) 4.2.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 4.2.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 4.2.1
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) NET-12
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational NET-12
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure NET-12
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats NET-12
US (4)
Framework Mapping Values
US CJIS Security Policy 5.9.3 (source) AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7 SI-10
US IRS 1075 AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5 SI-7 SI-10
US SSA EIESR 8.0 5.8
US - TX DIR Control Standards 2.0 AC-2 AC-3 AC-5 SI-3 SI-4 SI-5
EMEA (2)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 8.4 8.6 9.20 13.6
EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 2305
APAC (1)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC New Zealand HISF 2022 HMS17

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to Cryptographic implement strong cryptography and security protocols to safeguard sensitive/regulated data during transmission over open, public networks.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Network Security (NET) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • IT personnel use an informal process to design, build and maintain secure networks for test, development, staging and production environments, including the implementation of appropriate cybersecurity and data protection controls.
  • Administrative processes are used to configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
  • Network monitoring is primarily reactive in nature.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Network Security (NET) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Network security management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for network security management.
  • IT personnel define secure networking practices to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's technology assets, data and network(s).
  • Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
  • Administrative processes are used to configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
  • Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
Level 3 — Well Defined

Network Security (NET) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • A Technology Infrastructure team, or similar function, defines centrally-managed network security controls for implementation across the enterprise.
  • Secure engineering principles are used to design and implement network security controls (e.g., industry-recognized secure practices) to enforce the concepts of least privilege and least functionality at the network level.
  • IT/cybersecurity architects work with the Technology Infrastructure team to implement a “layered defense” network architecture that provides a defense-in-depth approach for redundancy and risk reduction for network-based security controls, including wired and wireless networking.
  • Administrative processes and technologies configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
  • Technologies automate the Access Control Lists (ACLs) and similar rulesets review process to identify security issues and/ or misconfigurations.
  • Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to Cryptographic implement strong cryptography and security protocols to safeguard sensitive/regulated data during transmission over open, public networks.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to Cryptographic implement strong cryptography and security protocols to safeguard sensitive/regulated data during transmission over open, public networks.

Assessment Objectives

  1. NET-12_A01 approved authorizations for logical access to information and system resources are enforced in accordance with applicable access control policies.

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.