NET-12.2: End-User Messaging Technologies
Mechanisms exist to prohibit the transmission of unprotected sensitive/regulated data by end-user messaging technologies.
Control Question: Does the organization prohibit the transmission of unprotected sensitive/regulated data by end-user messaging technologies?
General (7)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC6.7-POF1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) | 4.2.2 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) | 4.2.2 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) | 4.2.2 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) | 4.2.2 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) | 4.2.2 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | NET-12.2 |
US (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CMS MARS-E 2.0 | SC-ACA-1 SC-ACA-2 |
| US IRS 1075 | 3.3.2 3.3.3 3.3.4 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to prohibit the transmission of unprotected sensitive/regulated data by end-user messaging technologies.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Network Security (NET) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- IT personnel use an informal process to design, build and maintain secure networks for test, development, staging and production environments, including the implementation of appropriate cybersecurity and data protection controls.
- Administrative processes are used to configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
- Network monitoring is primarily reactive in nature.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Network Security (NET) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Network security management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for network security management.
- IT personnel define secure networking practices to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's technology assets, data and network(s).
- Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
- Administrative processes are used to configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
- Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
Level 3 — Well Defined
Network Security (NET) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- A Technology Infrastructure team, or similar function, defines centrally-managed network security controls for implementation across the enterprise.
- Secure engineering principles are used to design and implement network security controls (e.g., industry-recognized secure practices) to enforce the concepts of least privilege and least functionality at the network level.
- IT/cybersecurity architects work with the Technology Infrastructure team to implement a “layered defense” network architecture that provides a defense-in-depth approach for redundancy and risk reduction for network-based security controls, including wired and wireless networking.
- Administrative processes and technologies configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
- Technologies automate the Access Control Lists (ACLs) and similar rulesets review process to identify security issues and/ or misconfigurations.
- Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to prohibit the transmission of unprotected sensitive/regulated data by end-user messaging technologies.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to prohibit the transmission of unprotected sensitive/regulated data by end-user messaging technologies.
Assessment Objectives
- NET-12.2_A01 the transmission of unprotected sensitive / regulated data by end-user messaging technologies is prohibited through administrative and/or technical means.
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Acceptable Use Policy (AUP)
- Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
Small
- Acceptable Use Policy (AUP)
- Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
Medium
- Acceptable Use Policy (AUP)
- Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
Large
- Acceptable Use Policy (AUP)
- Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
Enterprise
- Acceptable Use Policy (AUP)
- Data Loss Prevention (DLP)