Skip to main content

PES-13: Information Leakage Due To Electromagnetic Signals Emanations

PES 5 — Medium Protect

Facility security mechanisms exist to protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.

Control Question: Does the organization protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations?

General (7)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) A1.2
ISO 27002 2022 8.12
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 PR.DS-P5
NIST 800-53 R4 PE-19
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) PE-19
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) PE-19
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) PES-13
US (3)
Framework Mapping Values
US FFIEC D3.PC.Am.B.15 D3.PC.Am.Int.1 D3.PC.De.Int.1 D3.DC.Ev.Int.1
US HIPAA HICP Medium Practice 4.M.C 4.M.E
US HIPAA HICP Large Practice 4.M.C 4.M.E 2.L.A 2.L.C 2.L.D 4.L.A
APAC (2)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-0246 ISM-0249 ISM-0250
APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 10.7.6.C.01 10.7.6.C.02 10.7.7.C.01 10.7.7.C.02 10.7.8.C.01 10.7.9.C.01

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Physical access control is decentralized.
  • Physical security controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards), focusing on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs).
  • Human Resources, or a similar function, maintains a current list of personnel and facilitates the implementation of physical access management controls.
  • Facility security mechanisms exist to protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Physical access control is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for physical access control.
  • Human Resources, or a similar function, maintains a current list of personnel with authorized access to organizational facilities and facilitates the implementation of physical access management controls.
  • Physical security controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards).
  • Physical controls, administrative processes and technologies are primarily designed and implemented for offices, rooms and facilities that focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
  • A facilities maintenance team, or similar function, manages the operation of automated physical and environmental protection controls.
  • Physical controls and technologies protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Performs the centralized-management of physical security controls across the enterprise. o Maintains a current list of personnel with authorized access to organizational facilities and implements physical access management controls.

  • A physical security team, or similar function:
  • A facilities maintenance team, or similar function, manages the operation of environmental protection controls.
  • Administrative processes exist to authorize physical access to facilities based on the position or role of the individual.
  • Administrative processes and physical controls restrict unescorted access to facilities to personnel with required security clearances, formal access authorizations and validated the need for access.
  • Physical controls and technologies protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.

Assessment Objectives

  1. PES-13_A01 the system is protected from information leakage due to electromagnetic signal emanations.

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.