PES-13: Information Leakage Due To Electromagnetic Signals Emanations
Facility security mechanisms exist to protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.
Control Question: Does the organization protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations?
General (7)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | A1.2 |
| ISO 27002 2022 | 8.12 |
| NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 | PR.DS-P5 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | PE-19 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | PE-19 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | PE-19 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | PES-13 |
US (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US FFIEC | D3.PC.Am.B.15 D3.PC.Am.Int.1 D3.PC.De.Int.1 D3.DC.Ev.Int.1 |
| US HIPAA HICP Medium Practice | 4.M.C 4.M.E |
| US HIPAA HICP Large Practice | 4.M.C 4.M.E 2.L.A 2.L.C 2.L.D 4.L.A |
APAC (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC Australia ISM June 2024 | ISM-0246 ISM-0249 ISM-0250 |
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 10.7.6.C.01 10.7.6.C.02 10.7.7.C.01 10.7.7.C.02 10.7.8.C.01 10.7.9.C.01 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Physical access control is decentralized.
- Physical security controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards), focusing on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs).
- Human Resources, or a similar function, maintains a current list of personnel and facilitates the implementation of physical access management controls.
- Facility security mechanisms exist to protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Physical access control is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for physical access control.
- Human Resources, or a similar function, maintains a current list of personnel with authorized access to organizational facilities and facilitates the implementation of physical access management controls.
- Physical security controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards).
- Physical controls, administrative processes and technologies are primarily designed and implemented for offices, rooms and facilities that focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
- A facilities maintenance team, or similar function, manages the operation of automated physical and environmental protection controls.
- Physical controls and technologies protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Performs the centralized-management of physical security controls across the enterprise. o Maintains a current list of personnel with authorized access to organizational facilities and implements physical access management controls.
- A physical security team, or similar function:
- A facilities maintenance team, or similar function, manages the operation of environmental protection controls.
- Administrative processes exist to authorize physical access to facilities based on the position or role of the individual.
- Administrative processes and physical controls restrict unescorted access to facilities to personnel with required security clearances, formal access authorizations and validated the need for access.
- Physical controls and technologies protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to protect the system from information leakage due to electromagnetic signals emanations.
Assessment Objectives
- PES-13_A01 the system is protected from information leakage due to electromagnetic signal emanations.