Skip to main content

PRM-01.1: Strategic Plan & Objectives

PRM 5 — Medium Identify

Mechanisms exist to establish a strategic cybersecurity and data protection-specific business plan and set of objectives to achieve that plan.

Control Question: Does the organization establish a strategic cybersecurity and data protection-specific business plan and set of objectives to achieve that plan?

General (8)
Framework Mapping Values
BSI Standard 200-1 8.1
COBIT 2019 APO01.01 APO01.02 APO01.03 APO02.02 APO02.05 APO02.06
ISO 42001 2023 4.1 4.2
NIST AI 100-1 (AI RMF) 1.0 MAP 1.3
NIST CSF 2.0 (source) GV GV.OC-04 GV.OV-01 GV.RM
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational PRM-01.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure PRM-01.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats PRM-01.1
US (4)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 PROGRAM-1.A.MIL1 PROGRAM-1.B.MIL2 PROGRAM-1.C.MIL2 PROGRAM-1.D.MIL2 PROGRAM-1.E.MIL2 PROGRAM-1.F.MIL2 PROGRAM-1.G.MIL2 PROGRAM-1.H.MIL3
US CERT RMM 1.2 EF:SG1.SP1
US FCA CRM 609.935 609.935(a)
US - CA CCPA 2025 7100(b) 7102(a)
EMEA (6)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU EBA GL/2019/04 3.2.1(4) 3.2.1(5)(a) 3.2.1(5)(b) 3.2.1(5)(c)
EMEA EU DORA 6.8 6.8(a) 6.8(b) 6.8(c) 6.8(d) 6.8(e) 6.8(f) 6.8(g) 6.8(h)
EMEA Germany Banking Supervisory Requirements for IT (BAIT) 1.1 1.2 1.2(a) 1.2(b) 1.2(c) 1.2(d) 1.2(e) 1.2(f)
EMEA Saudi Arabia CSCC-1 2019 1-1 1-1-1
EMEA Saudi Arabia ECC-1 2018 1-1-1 1-1-2
EMEA Saudi Arabia SAMA CSF 1.0 3.1.2
APAC (6)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-0039 ISM-0720
APAC Australia Prudential Standard CPS234 13 15
APAC India SEBI CSCRF GV.RR.S4
APAC Japan ISMAP 4.1 5.1 5.1.1 5.1.2
APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 2.3.25.C.01 2.3.25.C.02 2.3.29.C.01
APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 3.1.4 3.1.5
Americas (2)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada CSAG 1.1 6.7
Americas Canada OSFI B-13 1.2.1

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to establish a strategic cybersecurity and data protection-specific business plan and set of objectives to achieve that plan.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to establish a strategic cybersecurity and data protection-specific business plan and set of objectives to achieve that plan.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Project & Resource Management (PRM) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Program/project management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for Project Management (PM).
  • The PM function facilitates the implementation of cybersecurity and data protection-related resource planning controls across the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for all projects.
  • The responsibility for enforcing cybersecurity and data protection control implementation is assigned to business / process owners and asset custodians.
  • The Chief Information Officer (CIO), or similar function, analyzes the organization's business strategy and prioritizes the objectives and resourcing of the security function, based on broader business requirements.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Project & Resource Management (PRM) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), or similar function with technical competence to address cybersecurity concerns, analyzes the organization's business strategy to determine prioritized and authoritative guidance for program/project management practices.
  • The CISO, or similar function, develops a security-focused Concept of Operations (CONOPS) that documents management, operational and technical measures to apply defense-in-depth techniques across the enterprise with regards to program/project management.
  • The CISO, or similar function, leverages a capability maturity model to define and identify targeted capability maturity levels for each of the functions that make up the cybersecurity and data protection program.
  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function, provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data for program/project management.
  • A steering committee is formally established to provide executive oversight of the cybersecurity and data protection program, including program/project management.
  • A Project Management Office (PMO), or project management function, enables the centralized-implementation of cybersecurity and data protection-related resource planning controls across the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for all projects.
  • The PMO determines the identification and allocation of resources for cybersecurity and data protection requirements within business process planning for projects and other initiatives.
  • Project Management (PM) is centrally-managed across the enterprise to implement cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of the project management lifecycle, with the responsibility for enforcing cybersecurity and data protection control implementation assigned to business / process owners and asset custodians.
  • Subordinate staff and stakeholders are educated on the capability maturity expectations and those targets are used to task individual contributor work activities in an effort to achieve the targeted maturity levels.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to establish a strategic cybersecurity and data protection-specific business plan and set of objectives to achieve that plan.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to establish a strategic cybersecurity and data protection-specific business plan and set of objectives to achieve that plan.

Assessment Objectives

  1. PRM-01.1_A01 a documented strategic cybersecurity / data privacy-specific business plan exists.
  2. PRM-01.1_A02 a documented set of objectives to achieve that cybersecurity and privacy-specific business plan exists.

Evidence Requirements

E-PRM-01 Cybersecurity Business Plan (CBP)

Documented evidence of a cybersecurity-specific business plan that documents a strategic plan and discrete objectives.

Resource Management

Technology Recommendations

Medium

  • Documented cybersecurity and data protection-specific business plan

Large

  • Documented cybersecurity and data protection-specific business plan

Enterprise

  • Documented cybersecurity and data protection-specific business plan

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.