Skip to main content

TDA-06: Secure Software Development Practices (SSDP)

TDA 10 — Critical Protect

Mechanisms exist to develop applications based on Secure Software Development Practices (SSDP).

Control Question: Does the organization develop applications based on Secure Software Development Practices (SSDP)?

General (56)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) PI1.1 PI1.2 PI1.2-POF1 PI1.2-POF2 PI1.2-POF3 PI1.3 PI1.3-POF1 PI1.3-POF2 PI1.3-POF3 PI1.3-POF4 PI1.3-POF5 PI1.4 PI1.4-POF1 PI1.4-POF2 PI1.4-POF3 PI1.4-POF4 PI1.5 PI1.5-POF1 PI1.5-POF2 PI1.5-POF3 PI1.5-POF4
CIS CSC 8.1 16 16.1 16.5 16.10 16.11
CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 16.1 16.5 16.10 16.11
CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 16.1 16.5 16.10 16.11
COBIT 2019 APO03.02
CSA CCM 4 AIS-04
CSA IoT SCF 2 SDV-05
GovRAMP Low SA-01
GovRAMP Low+ SA-01
GovRAMP Moderate SA-01
GovRAMP High SA-01 SA-15
IEC 62443-4-2 2019 CCSC 4 (4.5)
ISO/SAE 21434 2021 RQ-10-01.a RQ-10-01.b RQ-10-01.c RQ-10-02 RQ-10-03 RQ-10-04.a RQ-10-04.b RQ-10-04.c RQ-10-04.d RQ-10-04.e RQ-10-04.f RQ-10-05 RQ-10-06 RQ-10-07 RQ-10-08 RQ-10-09
ISO 27002 2022 8.25 8.26 8.27 8.28 8.30
ISO 27017 2015 14.2.1 14.2.5
ISO 42001 2023 A.6.1.3 A.6.2.3
MITRE ATT&CK 10 T1078, T1078.001, T1078.003, T1078.004, T1213.003, T1528, T1552, T1552.001, T1552.002, T1552.004, T1552.006, T1558.004, T1574.002
MPA Content Security Program 5.1 TS-1.12 TS-1.13
NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) 4.D(2)(e)
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 CT.PO-P1 CT.DM-P7 CT.DM-P8 CT.DM-P9 CT.DM-P10
NIST 800-53 R4 SA-1 SA-15
NIST 800-53 R4 (low) SA-1
NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) SA-1
NIST 800-53 R4 (high) SA-1 SA-15
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) SA-1 SA-4(3) SA-15
NIST 800-53B R5 (privacy) (source) SA-1
NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) SA-1
NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) SA-1 SA-15
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) SA-1 SA-15
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) SA-4(3)
NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay SA-1
NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay SA-1 SA-15
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay SA-1 SA-15
NIST 800-161 R1 SA-1 SA-15
NIST 800-161 R1 C-SCRM Baseline SA-1
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 1 SA-1
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 SA-1 SA-15
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 SA-1 SA-15
NIST 800-171 R2 (source) NFO-SA-1
NIST 800-171A (source) 3.13.2[b] 3.13.2[e]
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.16.01
NIST 800-218 PO.1 PW.1 PW.1.3 PW.4.2 PW.5 PW.5.1 PW.6.1 PW.6.2 RV.3.4
NIST CSF 2.0 (source) PR.PS-06
OWASP Top 10 2021 A01:2021 A02:2021 A03:2021 A04:2021 A05:2021 A06:2021 A07:2021 A08:2021 A09:2021 A10:2021
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 6.2 6.2.1 6.2.4
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) 6.2.1 6.2.4
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) 6.2.1 6.2.4
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 6.2.1 6.2.4
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 6.2.1 6.2.4
SPARTA CM0017 CM0043
SWIFT CSF 2023 2.10
UL 2900-1 2017 4.1 5.1
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) TDA-06
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational TDA-06
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure TDA-06
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats TDA-06
US (23)
EMEA (10)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU EBA GL/2019/04 3.6.2(69)
EMEA EU NIS2 21.3
EMEA Germany Banking Supervisory Requirements for IT (BAIT) 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.10
EMEA Germany C5 2020 DEV-02 DEV-07 DEV-08
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 11.9 17.6 17.9 17.20 17.25
EMEA Saudi Arabia CSCC-1 2019 1-3-2-3 2-13-1 2-13-2 2-13-3-1 2-13-3-2 2-13-3-3 2-13-3-4
EMEA Saudi Arabia IoT CGIoT-1 2024 2-14-3
EMEA Saudi Arabia ECC-1 2018 1-6-3-1
EMEA Saudi Arabia SACS-002 TPC-60 TPC-62
EMEA UK CAF 4.0 A4.b
APAC (6)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-0401 ISM-1239 ISM-1419 ISM-1552
APAC Japan ISMAP 14.2.1 14.2.1.13.PB 14.2.5
APAC New Zealand HISF 2022 HHSP50 HML50 HSUP42
APAC New Zealand HISF Suppliers 2023 HSUP42
APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 14.4.5.C.01
APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 5.3.2 6.1.1 6.1.2 6.2.1 6.2.2 6.3.1 6.3.2 6.4.1 6.4.2 6.4.3 6.4.4 6.4.5 6.4.6 6.4.7 6.4.8 6.5.1 6.5.2 6.5.3
Americas (4)

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to develop applications based on Secure Software Development Practices (SSDP).

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to develop applications based on secure coding principles.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Development and acquisition management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for technology development and acquisition management.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel implement secure practices to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's technology assets, data and network(s).
  • Secure development practices mostly conform to industry-recognized standards for secure engineering (e.g., OWASP, NIST SP 800-218, NIST SP 800-160, etc.).
  • Procurement practices require third-party developers of systems, system components or services to follow secure engineering practices.
  • A Project Management Office (PMO), or project management function, enables the implementation of cybersecurity and data privacy-related resource planning controls across the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for all high-value projects.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data for technology development and acquisition. o Ensures the Information Assurance Program (IAP) evaluates applicable cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of “business as usual” pre-production testing. o Operates the Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program to identify and mitigate supply chain-related risks and threats.

  • Secure development practices conform to industry-recognized standards for secure engineering (e.g., OWASP, NIST SP 800-218, NIST SP 800-160, etc.).
  • A procurement team, or similar function, ensures that third party development and/ or acquisitions meet, or exceed, the organization's business, cybersecurity and data privacy requirements to have secure and resilient systems, applications, services and processes.
  • A Software Assurance Maturity Model (SAMM) governs a secure development lifecycle for the development of systems, applications and services.
  • Administrative processes exist and technologies are configured to implement secure configuration settings by default to reduce the likelihood of software being deployed with weak security settings, putting the asset at a greater risk of compromise.
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and applies the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data.
  • A formal Change Management (CM) program help to ensure that no unauthorized changes are made, all changes are documented, services are not disrupted and resources are used efficiently.
  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function;
  • A Project Management Office (PMO), or project management function, enables IAP pre-production testing of cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of the organization's established project management processes.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) efforts are “world-class” capabilities that leverage predictive analysis (e.g., machine learning, AI, etc.). In addition to CMM Level 4 criteria, CMM Level 5 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Stakeholders make time-sensitive decisions to support operational efficiency, which may include automated remediation actions.
  • Based on predictive analysis, process improvements are implemented according to “continuous improvement” practices that affect process changes.

Assessment Objectives

  1. TDA-06_A01 software development techniques that promote effective cybersecurity / data privacy are identified.
  2. TDA-06_A02 testing, evaluation, assessment, verification and validation methods are defined.
  3. TDA-06_A03 cybersecurity / data privacy requirements to be satisfied by the process, standards, tools, tool options and tool configurations are defined.
  4. TDA-06_A04 identified software development techniques that promote effective cybersecurity / data privacy are employed.
  5. TDA-06_A05 quality control processes are defined.
  6. TDA-06_A06 frequency at which to review the development process, standards, tools, tool options and tool configurations is defined.
  7. TDA-06_A07 the developer of the system, system component or system service is required to follow a documented development process that explicitly addresses security requirements.
  8. TDA-06_A08 the developer of the system, system component or system service is required to follow a documented development process that explicitly addresses privacy requirements.
  9. TDA-06_A09 the developer of the system, system component or system service is required to follow a documented development process that identifies the standards used in the development process.
  10. TDA-06_A10 the developer of the system, system component or system service is required to follow a documented development process that identifies the tools used in the development process.
  11. TDA-06_A11 the developer of the system, system component or system service is required to follow a documented development process that documents the specific tool used in the development process.
  12. TDA-06_A12 the developer of the system, system component or system service is required to follow a documented development process that documents the specific tool configurations used in the development process.
  13. TDA-06_A13 the developer of the system, system component or system service is required to follow a documented development process that documents, manages and ensures the integrity of changes to the process and/or tools used in development.
  14. TDA-06_A14 the developer of the system, system component or system service is required to follow a documented development process in which the development process, standards, tools, tool options and tool configurations are reviewed frequently to determine that the process, standards, tools, tool options and tool configurations selected and employed satisfy security requirements.
  15. TDA-06_A15 the developer of the system, system component or system service is required to follow a documented development process in which the development process, standards, tools, tool options and tool configurations are reviewed frequently to determine that the process, standards, tools, tool options and tool configurations selected and employed satisfy privacy requirements.
  16. TDA-06_A16 the developer of the system, system component or system service is required to demonstrate the use of a system development life cycle process that includes organization-defined system security engineering methods.

Evidence Requirements

E-TDA-08 Secure Engineering Principles (SEP)

Documented evidence of defined secure engineering principles used to ensure Sensitivity, Integrity, Availability & Safety (CIAS) concerns are properly addressed in the design and implementation of systems, applications and services.

Technology Design & Acquisition
E-TDA-11 Software Assurance Maturity Model (SAMM)

Documented evidence of a Software Assurance Maturity Model (SAMM).

Technology Design & Acquisition

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) practices
  • OWASP's Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS)
  • Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS)

Small

  • Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) practices
  • OWASP's Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS)
  • Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS)

Medium

  • Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) practices
  • OWASP's Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS)
  • Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS)

Large

  • Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) practices
  • OWASP's Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS)
  • Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS)

Enterprise

  • Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle (SDL) practices
  • OWASP's Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS)
  • Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.