Skip to main content

TDA-06.5: Software Design Review

TDA 10 — Critical Detect

Mechanisms exist to have an independent review of the software design to confirm that all cybersecurity and data protection requirements are met and that any identified risks are satisfactorily addressed.

Control Question: Does the organization have an independent review of the software design to confirm that all cybersecurity and data protection requirements are met and that any identified risks are satisfactorily addressed?

General (10)
Framework Mapping Values
CIS CSC 8.1 16.2 16.7 16.12
CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 16.2 16.7
CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 16.2 16.7 16.12
ISO/SAE 21434 2021 RQ-10-10.a RQ-10-10.b RQ-10-10.c RQ-10-10.d RQ-10-11 RQ-10-12 RQ-10-13 RQ-11-01.a RQ-11-01.b RQ-11-01.c RQ-11-01.d RQ-11-02
NIST 800-218 PO.4 PW.2 PW.2.1 RV.1 RV.1.2
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 6.2.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 6.2.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 6.2.3
SPARTA CM0043
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) TDA-06.5
US (3)
Framework Mapping Values
US DHS ZTCF DEV-03
US - CA CCPA 2025 7123(c)(14)
US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 500.8(a)
EMEA (3)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU EBA GL/2019/04 3.6.2(69)
EMEA Saudi Arabia IoT CGIoT-1 2024 2-14-3
EMEA Spain CCN-STIC 825 8.6.2 [MP.SW.2]
APAC (1)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 5.7.4 6.1.1 6.1.2 6.1.3 6.1.4 6.1.6 6.1.7
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada OSFI B-13 2.4.1 2.4.2

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to have an independent review of the software design to confirm that all cybersecurity and data protection requirements are met and that any identified risks are satisfactorily addressed.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to have an independent review of the software design to confirm that all cybersecurity and data protection requirements are met and that any identified risks are satisfactorily addressed.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to have an independent review of the software design to confirm that all cybersecurity and data protection requirements are met and that any identified risks are satisfactorily addressed.

Level 3 — Well Defined

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data for technology development and acquisition. o Ensures the Information Assurance Program (IAP) evaluates applicable cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of “business as usual” pre-production testing. o Operates the Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program to identify and mitigate supply chain-related risks and threats.

  • Secure development practices conform to industry-recognized standards for secure engineering (e.g., OWASP, NIST SP 800-218, NIST SP 800-160, etc.).
  • A procurement team, or similar function, ensures that third party development and/ or acquisitions meet, or exceed, the organization's business, cybersecurity and data protection requirements to have secure and resilient systems, applications, services and processes.
  • A Software Assurance Maturity Model (SAMM) governs a secure development lifecycle for the development of systems, applications and services.
  • Administrative processes exist and technologies are configured to implement secure configuration settings by default to reduce the likelihood of software being deployed with weak security settings, putting the asset at a greater risk of compromise.
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and applies the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data.
  • A formal Change Management (CM) program help to ensure that no unauthorized changes are made, all changes are documented, services are not disrupted and resources are used efficiently.
  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function;
  • A Project Management Office (PMO), or project management function, enables IAP pre-production testing of cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of the organization's established project management processes.
  • An independent software engineer reviews the software design to confirm that it meets all of the security requirements and satisfactorily addresses any identified risks.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to have an independent review of the software design to confirm that all cybersecurity and data protection requirements are met and that any identified risks are satisfactorily addressed.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to have an independent review of the software design to confirm that all cybersecurity and data protection requirements are met and that any identified risks are satisfactorily addressed.

Assessment Objectives

  1. TDA-06.5_A01 an independent review of the software design confirms that all cybersecurity / data privacy requirements are met and that any identified risks are satisfactorily addressed.

Evidence Requirements

E-TDA-05 Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)

Documented evidence of an engineering method designed to define, identify, and present solutions for system failures, problems, or errors.

Technology Design & Acquisition

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.