Skip to main content

IRO-04.3: Continuous Incident Response Improvements

IRO 3 — Low Identify

Mechanisms exist to use qualitative and quantitative data from incident response testing to: (1) Determine the effectiveness of incident response processes; (2) Continuously improve incident response processes; and (3) Provide incident response measures and metrics that are accurate, consistent and in a reproducible format.

Control Question: Does the organization use qualitative and quantitative data from incident response testing to: (1) Determine the effectiveness of incident response processes; (2) Continuously improve incident response processes; and (3) Provide incident response measures and metrics that are accurate, consistent, and in a reproducible format?

General (5)
Framework Mapping Values
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) IR-3(3)
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) IR-3(3)
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.06.04.b
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure IRO-04.3
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats IRO-04.3
US (2)
Framework Mapping Values
US CISA CPG 2022 2.S
US IRS 1075 IR-3(3)
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.06.04.B

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to use qualitative and quantitative data from incident response testing to: (1) Determine the effectiveness of incident response processes; (2) Continuously improve incident response processes; and (3) Provide incident response measures and metrics that are accurate, consistent, and in a reproducible format.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to use qualitative and quantitative data from incident response testing to: (1) Determine the effectiveness of incident response processes; (2) Continuously improve incident response processes; and (3) Provide incident response measures and metrics that are accurate, consistent, and in a reproducible format.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to use qualitative and quantitative data from incident response testing to: (1) Determine the effectiveness of incident response processes; (2) Continuously improve incident response processes; and (3) Provide incident response measures and metrics that are accurate, consistent, and in a reproducible format.

Level 3 — Well Defined

Incident Response (IR) processes are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT), or similar function, exists to form an on-demand, scalable and integrated team of formally-assigned cybersecurity, IT, data privacy and business function representatives that can perform coordinated incident response.
  • The ISIRT, or similar function, develops and maintains a documented, program-level Integrated Incident Response Program (IIRP) that provides operational and tactical-level guidance for cybersecurity and data privacy response operations.
  • A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar function, facilitates incident management operations that includes preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
  • Business Process Owners (BPOs), in conjunction with the SOC and ISIRT functions, develop and maintain a documented Incident Response Plan (IRP) specific to the business process / business unit but inclusive of the organization's larger approach to incident response operations.
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and provides that information to the SOC for Incident Response Operations (IRO).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to use qualitative and quantitative data from incident response testing to: (1) Determine the effectiveness of incident response processes; (2) Continuously improve incident response processes; and (3) Provide incident response measures and metrics that are accurate, consistent, and in a reproducible format.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to use qualitative and quantitative data from incident response testing to: (1) Determine the effectiveness of incident response processes; (2) Continuously improve incident response processes; and (3) Provide incident response measures and metrics that are accurate, consistent, and in a reproducible format.

Assessment Objectives

  1. IRO-04.3_A01 qualitative / quantitative data from testing are used to determine the effectiveness of incident response processes.
  2. IRO-04.3_A02 qualitative / quantitative data from testing are used to continuously improve incident response processes.
  3. IRO-04.3_A03 qualitative / quantitative data from testing are used to provide incident response measures and metrics that are accurate.
  4. IRO-04.3_A04 qualitative / quantitative data from testing are used to provide incident response measures and metrics that are consistent.
  5. IRO-04.3_A05 qualitative / quantitative data from testing are used to provide incident response measures and metrics in a reproducible format.

Technology Recommendations

Medium

  • ITIL 4 (https://axelos.com) - Incident and problem management

Large

  • ITIL 4 (https://axelos.com) - Incident and problem management

Enterprise

  • ITIL 4 (https://axelos.com) - Incident and problem management

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.