PRI-17: Data Subject Communications
Mechanisms exist to craft disclosures and communications to data subjects in a manner that is concise, unambiguous and understandable by a reasonable person.
Control Question: Does the organization craft disclosures and communications to data subjects in a manner that is concise, unambiguous and understandable by a reasonable person?
General (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | P6.7-POF3 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | PRI-17 |
US (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US - CA CCPA 2025 | 7003(a) 7004(a)(3) 7222(b) 7222(b)(1) 7222(b)(2) 7222(b)(3) 7222(b)(3)(A) 7222(b)(4) 7222(b)(4)(A) 7222(c) 7222(c)(1) 7222(c)(2) 7222(c)(2)(A) 7222(c)(2)(B) 7222(c)(2)(C) 7222(d) 7222(e) 7222(f) 7222(g) 7222(h) 7222(i) 7222(j) 7222(k) |
| US - VA CDPA 2025 | 59.1-577.B.2 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to craft disclosures and communications to data subjects such that the material is readily accessible and written in a manner that is concise, unambiguous and understandable by a reasonable person.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to craft disclosures and communications to data subjects such that the material is readily accessible and written in a manner that is concise, unambiguous and understandable by a reasonable person.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Privacy (PRI) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Privacy management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- The data privacy program is developed to work with IT and cybersecurity staff to ensure that applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual data privacy obligations for Personal Data (PD) are properly identified and implemented across the enterprise.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for data privacy management.
- A qualified individual is formally assigned as the Chief Privacy Officer (CPO), or similar role, to lead the organization's data privacy program. This individual may be assigned to multiple duties, including that as a Data Protection Officer (DPO).
- The CPO, or similar role, identifies “data privacy principles” that systems, applications, services, processes and third-parties must adhere to, based on leading data privacy practices.
- Communications with data subjects is designed to be readily accessible and written in a manner that is concise, unambiguous and understandable by a reasonable person.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Privacy (PRI) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- A Chief Privacy Officer (CPO), or similar function with technical competence to address data privacy concerns, analyzes the organization's business strategy to develop and publish authoritative guidance on the organization's data privacy program.
- A Privacy program, run by a CPO, or similar role, ensures that applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual data privacy obligations are properly identified and implemented to limit and secure Personal Data (PD) that the organization stores, transmits and processes.
- As part of the organization's data privacy program, the CPO publishes a clear set of “data privacy principles”, based on leading data privacy practices, that systems, applications, services, processes and third-parties must adhere to.
- A Project Management Office (PMO), or project management function, ensures both cybersecurity and data privacy principles are identified and implemented within ongoing or planned projects.
- The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), or similar function with technical competence to address cybersecurity concerns, analyzes the organization's business strategy to determine prioritized and authoritative guidance for cybersecurity-related data privacy practices.
- The CISO, or similar function, develops a security-focused Concept of Operations (CONOPS) that documents management, operational and technical measures to apply defense-in-depth techniques across the enterprise for cybersecurity-related data privacy practices.
- A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function, provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data with regards to data privacy.
- A steering committee is formally established to provide executive oversight of the cybersecurity and data privacy program.
- Data/process owners operationalize data privacy controls into the processes they control.
- Third-party contracts included data protection requirements, including flow-down requirements to subcontractors.
- Data Protection Officers (DPOs) are assigned to work closely with business units and project teams to ensure data privacy principles are being implemented.
- CPO and DPO determine and document the legal authority that permits the collection, use, maintenance and sharing of PD, either generally or in support of a specific program or system need.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to craft disclosures and communications to data subjects such that the material is readily accessible and written in a manner that is concise, unambiguous and understandable by a reasonable person.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to craft disclosures and communications to data subjects such that the material is readily accessible and written in a manner that is concise, unambiguous and understandable by a reasonable person.
Assessment Objectives
- PRI-17_A01 disclosures and communications to data subjects are made easily accessible.
- PRI-17_A02 disclosures and communications to data subjects are written in a manner that is concise, unambiguous and understandable by a reasonable person.
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Data classification program
- Data privacy program
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
- Product / project management
Small
- Data classification program
- Data privacy program
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
- Product / project management
Medium
- Data classification program
- Data privacy program
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
- Product / project management
Large
- Data classification program
- Data privacy program
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
- Product / project management
Enterprise
- Data classification program
- Data privacy program
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
- Product / project management