Skip to main content

TPM-05.5: Third-Party Scope Review

TPM 10 — Critical Identify

Mechanisms exist to perform recurring validation of the Responsible, Accountable, Supportive, Consulted & Informed (RASCI) matrix, or similar documentation, to ensure cybersecurity and data protection control assignments accurately reflect current business practices, compliance obligations, technologies and stakeholders.

Control Question: Does the organization perform recurring validation of the Responsible, Accountable, Supportive, Consulted & Informed (RASCI) matrix, or similar documentation, to ensure cybersecurity and data protection control assignments accurately reflect current business practices, compliance obligations, technologies and stakeholders?

General (21)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC2.2-POF9 CC3.4-POF5 CC9.2-POF12 CC9.2-POF7
CIS CSC 8.1 15
ISO 42001 2023 4.3
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.16.03.c 03.17.02 03.17.03.a 03.17.03.b
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.16.03.c
NIST CSF 2.0 (source) GV.SC-06
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 12.5.2.1 12.5.3 12.8 12.8.1 A3.2.1 A3.2.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A (source) 12.8.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) 12.8.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B (source) 12.8.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B-IP (source) 12.8.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) 12.8.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C-VT (source) 12.8.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 12.8.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 12.5.2.1 12.5.3 12.8.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ P2PE (source) 12.8.1
SWIFT CSF 2023 2.8A
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) TPM-05.5
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational TPM-05.5
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure TPM-05.5
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats TPM-05.5
US (2)
Framework Mapping Values
US - CA CCPA 2025 7123(c)(15)
US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 500.11(a)(3) 500.11(a)(4)
EMEA (2)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU EBA GL/2019/04 3.5(55)
EMEA EU NIS2 21.3
APAC (1)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-1793
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.16.03.C 03.17.02 03.17.03.A 03.17.03.B

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to perform recurring validation of the Responsible, Accountable, Supportive, Consulted & Informed (RASCI) matrix, or similar documentation, to ensure cybersecurity and data protection control assignments accurately reflect current business practices, compliance obligations, technologies and stakeholders.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to perform recurring validation of the Responsible, Accountable, Supportive, Consulted & Informed (RASCI) matrix, or similar documentation, to ensure cybersecurity and data protection control assignments accurately reflect current business practices, compliance obligations, technologies and stakeholders.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Third-Party Management (TPM) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Require TSP to follow secure engineering practices as part of a broader Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) initiative. o Contain "break clauses" in all TSP contracts to enable penalty-free, early termination of a contract for cause, based on the TSP's cybersecurity and/ or data protection practices deficiency(ies).

  • Third-party management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for third-party management.
  • A procurement function maintains a list of all active Third-Party Service Providers (TSP), including pertinent contract information that will assist in a risk assessment.
  • A Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM) is documented for every TSP that directly or indirectly affects sensitive/regulated data.
  • Procurement contracts:
Level 3 — Well Defined

Third-Party Management (TPM) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data with regards to third-party management. o Operates the Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program to identify and mitigate supply chain-related risks and threats. o Evaluates risks associated with weaknesses or deficiencies in supply chain elements identified during first and/ or third-party reviews. o Enables the implementation of third-party management controls. o Ensures the Information Assurance Program (IAP) evaluates applicable cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of “business as usual” pre-production testing. o Maintains a list of all active Third-Party Service Providers (TSP), including pertinent contract information that will assist in a risk assessment. o Requires TSP to follow secure engineering practices as part of a broader Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) initiative. o Includes "break clauses" in all TSP contracts to enable penalty-free, early termination of a contract for cause, based on the TSP's cybersecurity and/ or data protection practices deficiency(ies). o Controls changes to services by suppliers, taking into account the criticality of business information, systems and processes that are in scope by the third-party. o Requires a risk assessment prior to the acquisition or outsourcing of technology-related services. o Monitors, regularly reviews and audits supplier service delivery for compliance with established contract agreements. o Uses tailored acquisition strategies, contract tools and procurement methods for the purchase of unique systems, system components or services.

  • Procurement contracts and layered defenses provide safeguards to limit harm from potential adversaries who identify and target the organization's supply chain.
  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function;
  • A procurement team, or similar function:
  • A Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM) is documented for every TSP that directly or indirectly affects sensitive/regulated data.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to perform recurring validation of the Responsible, Accountable, Supportive, Consulted & Informed (RASCI) matrix, or similar documentation, to ensure cybersecurity and data protection control assignments accurately reflect current business practices, compliance obligations, technologies and stakeholders.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to perform recurring validation of the Responsible, Accountable, Supportive, Consulted & Informed (RASCI) matrix, or similar documentation, to ensure cybersecurity and data protection control assignments accurately reflect current business practices, compliance obligations, technologies and stakeholders.

Assessment Objectives

  1. TPM-05.5_A01 recurring validation of the Responsible, Accountable, Supportive, Consulted & Informed (RASCI) matrix, or similar documentation, is performed to ensure cybersecurity / data privacy control assignments accurately reflect current business practices, compliance obligations, technologies and stakeholders.
  2. TPM-05.5_A02 processes, methods, and techniques to monitor security requirement compliance by external service providers on an ongoing basis are implemented.

Evidence Requirements

E-TPM-03 Third-Party Service Reviews

Documented evidence of a formal, annual stakeholder review of third-party services for each Third-Party Service Provider (TSP).

Third-Party Management

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program

Small

  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program

Medium

  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program

Large

  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program

Enterprise

  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.