Skip to main content

MNT-05.5: Remote Maintenance Pre-Approval

MNT 7 — High Protect

Mechanisms exist to require maintenance personnel to obtain pre-approval and scheduling for remote, non-local maintenance sessions.

Control Question: Does the organization require maintenance personnel to obtain pre-approval and scheduling for remote, non-local maintenance sessions?

General (7)
Framework Mapping Values
NIST 800-53 R4 MA-4(5)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) MA-4(5)
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) MA-4(5)
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.07.05.a
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) MNT-05.5
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure MNT-05.5
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats MNT-05.5
US (2)
Framework Mapping Values
US HIPAA HICP Large Practice 5.L.A
US NERC CIP 2024 (source) CIP-005-7 3.1
EMEA (1)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 12.7
APAC (1)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC India SEBI CSCRF PR.MA.S2
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.07.05.A

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to require maintenance personnel to obtain pre-approval and scheduling for remote, non-local maintenance sessions.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to require maintenance personnel to obtain pre-approval and scheduling for remote, non-local maintenance sessions.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Maintenance (MNT) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to appropriately address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for technology asset maintenance. o Develop and disseminate formal guidance to facilitate a localized/regionalized process to implement secure and timely technology asset-specific maintenance operations, including preventative and reactionary maintenance operations.

  • Technology asset maintenance is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel:
  • Maintenance controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to manage change control processes associated with maintenance operations.
  • Asset custodians develop and maintain formalized procedures to conduct controlled and timely maintenance activities throughout the lifecycle of the system, application or service.
  • Maintenance operations may be centralized for certain locations (e.g., datacenters) and decentralized for other locations, both in terms of change management and execution.
  • Facilities management uses a localized/regionalized process to facilitate the secure and timely implementation of non-IT maintenance operations, including preventative and reactionary maintenance operations.
  • Administrative processes and technologies exist to authorize, monitor and control non-local maintenance and diagnostic activities.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Maintenance (MNT) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • IT/cybersecurity personnel develop and disseminate formal practices to implement enterprise-wide capability to conduct secure and timely technology asset-specific maintenance operations, including preventative and reactionary maintenance operations.
  • Technology asset-related maintenance operations are centralized in terms of change management and governance. Local/regional practices fall under the broader enterprise-wide technology asset maintenance program.
  • Facilities management uses an enterprise-wide process to facilitate the secure and timely implementation of non-IT maintenance operations, including preventative and reactionary maintenance operations. Local/regional practices fall under the broader enterprise-wide facilities management program.
  • A Change Control Board (CCB), or similar function, centrally manages the process of IT and non-IT maintenance operations to reduce the chance of business interruptions from maintenance operations.
  • Administrative processes and technologies exist to authorize, monitor and control non-local maintenance and diagnostic activities.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to require maintenance personnel to obtain pre-approval and scheduling for remote, non-local maintenance sessions.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to require maintenance personnel to obtain pre-approval and scheduling for remote, non-local maintenance sessions.

Assessment Objectives

  1. MNT-05.5_A01 personnel or roles required to approve each nonlocal maintenance session is/are defined.
  2. MNT-05.5_A02 the approval of each nonlocal maintenance session is required by personnel or roles.

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.